ArticleDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease2019
Analysis of urine-specific antibiograms from veterans to guide empiric therapy for suspected urinary tract infection.
Article in Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Precision Medicine Concepts in Ambulatory Antibiotic Management of Acute Pyelonephritis.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Appropriateness of Empirical Antimicrobial Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Female Patients in Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia.Clinics and practice · 2023Article
- Article
- Diagnostic value of different urine tests for urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
- Distribution and drug resistance of pathogens causing urinary tract infection in patients with urinary calculi.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Microbial Resistance in Urinary Tract Infections.Cureus · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common among patients at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs), many of whom are elderly men with underlying urological problems. Most UTI guidelines address uncomplicated UTI in women, and clinicians may select empiric therapy based on local hospital-wide Escherichia coli cumulative susceptibility (antibiogram) data. To inform selection of empiric therapy for UTI at the Minneapolis VAMC (MVAMC), we compiled antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results for 1 year's urine isolates. We analyzed these AST results (bioMerieux VITEK®) for 2494 microbiologically significant urine isolates at MVAMC from June 2013 through May 2014. For antimicrobial-organism combinations that were not tested, we imputed results based on local or published data and/or expert opinion. For ambiguous antimicrobial-organism combinations, we analyzed susceptibility as both 0% and 100%. We calculated cumulative percent susceptible for 26 relevant antimicrobial agents, overall and stratified by Gram stain characteristic and clinical site. The study population included 1548 Gram-negative and 946 Gram-positive urine isolates. Species distribution varied significantly by clinical site. E. coli represented only 27% of isolates overall (9-37%, depending on site); also prevalent were Enterococcus (14%) and other Gram-positive organisms (23%). Urine-specific antibiograms varied significantly by Gram stain characteristic, between E. coli and other Gram-negative organisms, and by clinical site. Of the oral agents, only fosfomycin provided ≥80% susceptibility. Ultimately, E. coli represented urine isolates poorly with respect to species distribution and AST results. We conclude that urine-specific antibiograms, stratified by Gram stain characteristic and clinical site, may improve empirical UTI therapy for veterans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.