ArticleBMC medicine2019
Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Structural marginalization of older adults within health care settings: a concept analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of the utility of the frailty index and frailty phenotype to predict all-cause mortality in older people.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Feasibility and acceptability of the Health Assessment Tool (HAT) in Swedish primary care: insights into older patients' needs and professional perspectives.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Comparing geriatric assessment tools for predicting negative health outcomes in older adults.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- The evolution toward integrated community health care for older people in Italy.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Review
- Sex differences in the impact of lower respiratory tract infections on older adults' health trajectories: a population-based cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Cognition mediates the relationship between white matter hyperintensity and motor function in patients with cerebral small vessel disease: a cross-sectional study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Validation of the Health Assessment Tool (HAT) based on four aging cohorts from the Swedish National study on Aging and Care.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Low Physical Performance Could Be Associated with Adverse Health Outcomes over Time: Results from a Cohort of Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- The prognostic value of the NECPAL instrument, Palliative Prognostic Index, and PROFUND index in elderly residents of nursing homes with advanced chronic condition.BMC geriatrics · 2023Observational
- Frailty detection among primary care older patients through the Primary Care Frailty Index (PC-FI).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Beyond Chronological Age: A Multidimensional Approach to Survival Prediction in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023Article
- Prognostic significance of frailty status in patients with primary lung cancer.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Validation of FES-I and Short FES-I Scales in the Polish Setting as the Research Tools of Choice to Identify the Fear of Falling in Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Dynamics of multimorbidity and frailty, and their contribution to mortality, nursing home and home care need: A primary care cohort of 1 456 052 ageing people.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- Predictive Validity of Motor Fitness and Flexibility Tests in Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Health trajectories after age 60: the role of individual behaviors and the social context.Aging · 2021Article
- Special Issue-"Multimorbidity Development and Evolution: Clinical Implications".Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Fostering healthy aging: The interdependency of infections, immunity and frailty.Ageing research reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe identification of individuals at increased risk of poor health-related outcomes is a priority. Geriatric research has proposed several indicators shown to be associated with these outcomes, but a head-to-head comparison of their predictive accuracy is still lacking. We therefore aimed to compare the accuracy of five geriatric health indicators in predicting different outcomes among older persons: frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype (FP), walking speed (WS), multimorbidity, and a summary score including clinical diagnoses, functioning, and disability (the Health Assessment Tool; HAT).
methodsData were retrieved from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen, an ongoing longitudinal study including 3363 people aged 60+. To inspect the accuracy of geriatric health indicators, we employed areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the prediction of 3-year and 5-year mortality, 1-year and 3-year unplanned hospitalizations (1+), and contacts with healthcare providers in the 6 months before and after baseline evaluation (2+).
resultsFI, WS, and HAT showed the best accuracy in the prediction of mortality [AUC(95%CI) for 3-year mortality 0.84 (0.82-0.86), 0.85 (0.83-0.87), 0.87 (0.85-0.88) and AUC(95%CI) for 5-year mortality 0.84 (0.82-0.86), 0.85 (0.83-0.86), 0.86 (0.85-0.88), respectively]. Unplanned hospitalizations were better predicted by the FI [AUC(95%CI) 1-year 0.73 (0.71-0.76); 3-year 0.72 (0.70-0.73)] and HAT [AUC(95%CI) 1-year 0.73 (0.71-0.75); 3-year 0.71 (0.69-0.73)]. The most accurate predictor of multiple contacts with healthcare providers was multimorbidity [AUC(95%CI) 0.67 (0.65-0.68)]. Predictions were generally less accurate among younger individuals (< 78 years old).
conclusionSpecific geriatric health indicators predict clinical outcomes with different accuracy. Comprehensive indicators (HAT, FI, WS) perform better in predicting mortality and hospitalization. Multimorbidity exhibits the best accuracy in the prediction of multiple contacts with providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.