Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31574999›Full record

ArticlePolymers2019

3D Bio-Printing of CS/Gel/HA/Gr Hybrid Osteochondral Scaffolds.

Xueyan Hu, Yuan Man, Wenfang Li, Liying Li, Jie Xu, Roxanne Parungao, Yiwei Wang, Shuangshuang Zheng, Yi Nie, Tianqing Liu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. [The application and prospects of three dimensional bioprinting in urinary system reconstruction].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xueyan HuState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian R&D Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. Huxueyan@mail.dlut.edu.cn.
Yuan ManState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian R&D Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. 975202979@mail.dlut.edu.cn.
Wenfang LiState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian R&D Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. liwenfang@mail.dlut.edu.cn.
Liying LiState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian R&D Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. liyingli@mail.dlut.edu.cn.
Jie XuState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian R&D Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. xujie172@mail.dlut.edu.cn.
Roxanne ParungaoBurns Research Group, ANZAC Research Institute, University of Sydney, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia. rpar4161@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Yiwei WangBurns Research Group, ANZAC Research Institute, University of Sydney, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia. yiweiwang@anzac.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6585-6641
Shuangshuang ZhengZhengzhou Institute of Emerging Industrial Technology, Zhengzhou 450000, China. sszheng@ipezz.ac.cn.
Yi NieZhengzhou Institute of Emerging Industrial Technology, Zhengzhou 450000, China. Kedongsong@dlut.edu.cn.
Tianqing LiuState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian R&D Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. ynie@ipe.ac.cn.
Kedong SongState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian R&D Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. liutq@dlut.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2185-1050
Dalian University of Technology · CNThe University of Sydney · AUInstitute of Process Engineering · CNZhengzhou Institute of Emerging Industrial Technology · CN

Funding

Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation 132027National Natural Science Foundation of China 31670978/31370991/21676041Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning 20180510028State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals KF1111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cartilage is an important tissue contributing to the structure and function of support and protection in the human body. There are many challenges for tissue cartilage repair. However, 3D bio-printing of osteochondral scaffolds provides a promising solution. This study involved preparing bio-inks with different proportions of chitosan (Cs), Gelatin (Gel), and Hyaluronic acid (HA). The rheological properties of each bio-ink was used to identify the optimal bio-ink for printing. To improve the mechanical properties of the bio-scaffold, Graphene (GR) with a mass ratio of 0.024, 0.06, and 0.1% was doped in the bio-ink. Bio-scaffolds were prepared using 3D printing technology. The mechanical strength, water absorption rate, porosity, and degradation rate of the bio-scaffolds were compared to select the most suitable scaffold to support the proliferation and differentiation of cells. P3 Bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were inoculated onto the bio-scaffolds to study the biocompatibility of the scaffolds. The results of SEM showed that the Cs/Gel/HA scaffolds with a GR content of 0, 0.024, 0.06, and 0.1% had a good three-dimensional porous structure and interpenetrating pores, and a porosity of more than 80%. GR was evenly distributed on the scaffold as observed by energy spectrum analyzer and polarizing microscope. With increasing GR content, the mechanical strength of the scaffold was enhanced, and pore walls became thicker and smoother. BMSCs were inoculated on the different scaffolds. The cells distributed and extended well on Cs/Gel/HA/GR scaffolds. Compared to traditional methods in tissue-engineering, this technique displays important advantages in simulating natural cartilage with the ability to finely control the mechanical and chemical properties of the scaffold to support cell distribution and proliferation for tissue repair.

Indexed as

3D printingbio-inkcartilage repairchitosan/gelatin/hyaluronic acidgraphene

Identifiers

PMID31574999
PMCPMC6835996
OpenAlexW2976694424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.