ArticleMedicine2019
Adjunctive granisetron therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock (GRANTISS): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03924518 (Adjunctive Granisetron Therapy in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock:A Single-center, Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Adjunctive Granisetron Therapy in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock:A Single-center, Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive enrichment using biomarkers in studies of critically-ill patients with sepsis: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Experimental Evidence of Buyang Huanwu Decoction and Related Modern Preparations (Naoxintong Capsule and Yangyin Tongnao Granule) in Treating Cerebral Ischemia: Intestinal Microorganisms and Transcriptomics in Rats.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Adjunctive granisetron therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock (GRANTISS): A single-center, single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe incidence, mortality, and treatment costs of sepsis are high and, thus, present a major challenge for critical care medicine. Our previous studies suggest that intestinal metabolite granisetron has a potential therapeutic effect on sepsis. Granisetron is a clinically widely used antiemetic, which is safe, inexpensive, and reliable. However, its value in the treatment of sepsis remains unclear. This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of granisetron in the treatment of sepsis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-center, single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial will be conducted on 154 patients with sepsis. Patients who meet sepsis 3.0 diagnostic criteria, aged ≥18 and ≤80 years, with PCT ≥ 2 ng/mL will be recruited. Patients will be randomized to receive intravenous granisetron 3 mg every 8 hours (n = 77) or an equal volume of normal saline (n = 77) for a treatment period of 4 days or to ICU discharge. The primary outcome is 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures include requirements for organ function support, changes of organ function, changes in infection biomarkers, changes in inflammatory and immune biomarkers, and the proportion of new organ failure. Adverse events and serious adverse events also will be observed closely. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Clinical Ethics Committee of Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University (2018-ZZJHZX-009). The trial results will be disseminated at national and international conferences and through peer-reviewed journal.
trial registrationNCT03924518.URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov. PROTOCOL DATE: 1 May 2019. version 2.1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.