Observational studyMedicine2019
Evaluation of abches and volumetric modulated arc therapy under deep inspiration breath-hold technique for patients with left-sided breast cancer: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Dosimetric comparison of DIBH and FB for left-sided breast cancer radiation therapy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of deep inspiration breath-hold technique for left-side breast cancer with respiratory monitoring device, Abches.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy has clinical benefits including reducing local recurrence and improving overall survival. Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique using the Abches system is an easy and practical method to reduce radiation dose to the heart and lungs. This retrospective study was proposed to investigate the dosimetric difference between Abches system and free breathing technique in treating left-sided breast cancer.Eligible patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans to acquire both free breathing (FB) and DIBH technique data using the Abches. For each patient, both FB and DIBH image sets were planned based on the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Radiation dose to the heart, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral lung was compared between the Abches system and FB.No significant differences in the planning target volume (PTV) (674.58 vs 665.88 cm, P = .29), mean dose (52.28 vs 52.03 Gy, P = .13), and volume received at the prescribed dose (Vpd) (94.66% vs 93.92%, P = .32) of PTV were observed between the FB and DIBH plans. Significant differences were found in mean heart (6.71 Gy vs 4.21 Gy, P < .001), heart V5 (22.73% vs 14.39%, P = .002), heart V20 (10.96% vs. 5.62%, P < .001), mean left lung (11.51 vs 10.07 Gy, P = .01), left lung V20 (22.88% vs 19.53%, P = .02), left lung V30 (18.58 vs 15.27%, P = .005), and mean right lung dose (.89 vs 72 Gy, P = .03).This is the first report on reduced mean left lung, mean right lung dose, and V20 of left lung using VMAT and Abches. The combination of Abches and VMAT can practically and efficiently reduce extraradiation doses to the heart and lungs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.