Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31574839›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Efficacy of ventilator for patients with atelectasis: A systematic review protocol of randomized controlled trials.

Zhi-Guo Wang, Jian-Rong Sun, Hai-Wang Sha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhi-Guo WangDepartment of Elderly Respiratory Medicine, Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Specialist Ward Affiliated to Yanan University.
Jian-Rong SunDepartment of Elderly Respiratory Medicine, Dongguan Hospital of Yanan University Affiliated Hospital.
Hai-Wang ShaSurgical Intensive Care Center, Yanan University Affiliated Hospital, Yan'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of ventilator for the treatment of atelectasis.

methodsWe will search Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EBSCO, Chinese database Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang data from inceptions to June 30, 2019 without language limitations. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ventilator on evaluating the efficacy and safety of ventilator for atelectasis. We will use Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the methodological quality for all included RCTs. RevMan 5.3 software will be used for statistical analysis.

resultsThe primary outcome is lung function. The secondary outcomes comprise of airway pressure, mean arterial pressure, arterial blood gas, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and adverse events.

conclusionThe findings of this study will provide most recent evidence of ventilator for the treatment of atelectasis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019139329.

Indexed as

Ventilators, MechanicalHumansPulmonary AtelectasisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignRespiratory TherapySystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31574839
PMCPMC6775436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.