ArticlePhysical review. E2019
Optimal estimation of drift and diffusion coefficients in the presence of static localization error.
Article in Physical review. E, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Approximate Bayesian inference in a model for self-generated gradient collective cell movement.Computational statistics · 2025Article
- 4Pi MINFLUX arrangement maximizes spatio-temporal localization precision of fluorescence emitter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We consider the inference of the drift velocity and the diffusion coefficient of a particle undergoing a directed random walk in the presence of static localization error. A weighted least-squares fit to mean-square displacement (MSD) data is used to infer the parameters of the assumed drift-diffusion model. For experiments which cannot be repeated we show that the quality of the inferred parameters depends on the number of MSD points used in the fitting. An optimal number of fitting points p_{opt} is shown to exist which depends on the time interval between frames Δt and the unknown parameters. We therefore also present a simple iterative algorithm which converges rapidly toward p_{opt}. For repeatable experiments the quality depends crucially on the measurement time interval over which measurements are made, reflecting the different timescales associated with drift and diffusion. An optimal measurement time interval T_{opt} exists, which depends on the number of measurement points and the unknown parameters, and so again we present an iterative algorithm which converges quickly toward T_{opt} and is shown to be robust to initial parameter guesses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.