ArticleNeuroImage2020
Individualized functional networks reconfigure with cognitive state.
Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Cognition, but not affect, rests upon a segregated intrinsic network architecture.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The architecture of the human default mode network explored through cytoarchitecture, wiring and signal flow.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Geometric influences on the regional organization of the mammalian brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Structure-function relationships across scales: implications for atlases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Supervised brain node and network construction under voxel-level functional imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Brain functional alternation in patients with systemic sclerosis: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Article
- Longitudinal single-subject neuroimaging study reveals effects of daily environmental, physiological, and lifestyle factors on functional brain connectivity.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Task-specific topology of brain networks supporting working memory and inhibition.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Intrinsic connectivity demonstrates a shared role of the posterior cingulate for cue reactivity in both gambling and cocaine use disorders.Addictive behaviors · 2024Article
- Lateralized Functional Connectivity of the Sensorimotor Cortex and its Variations During Complex Visuomotor Tasks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- The Commonality and Individuality of Human Brains When Performing Tasks.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Debates on the dorsomedial prefrontal/dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: insights for future research.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Fractal basins as a mechanism for the nimble brain.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Neurofunctional underpinnings of individual differences in visual episodic memory performance.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Estimating dynamic individual coactivation patterns based on densely sampled resting-state fMRI data and utilizing it for better subject identification.Brain structure & function · 2023Article
- Subject-specific whole-brain parcellations of nodes and boundaries are modulated differently under 10 Hz rTMS.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Masked features of task states found in individual brain networks.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Cingulo-Opercular Subnetworks Motivate Frontoparietal Subnetworks during Distinct Cognitive Control Demands.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is extensive evidence that functional organization of the human brain varies dynamically as the brain switches between task demands, or cognitive states. This functional organization also varies across subjects, even when engaged in similar tasks. To date, the functional network organization of the brain has been considered static. In this work, we use fMRI data obtained across multiple cognitive states (task-evoked and rest conditions) and across multiple subjects, to measure state- and subject-specific functional network parcellation (the assignment of nodes to networks). Our parcellation approach provides a measure of how node-to-network assignment (NNA) changes across states and across subjects. We demonstrate that the brain's functional networks are not spatially fixed, but that many nodes change their network membership as a function of cognitive state. Such reconfigurations are highly robust and reliable to the extent that they can be used to predict cognitive state with up to 97% accuracy. Our findings suggest that if functional networks are to be defined via functional clustering of nodes, then it is essential to consider that such definitions may be fluid and cognitive-state dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.