Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31574132›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Using long-term datasets to assess the impacts of dietary exposure to neonicotinoids on farmland bird populations in England.

Rosie J Lennon, Nick J B Isaac, Richard F Shore, Will J Peach, Jenny C Dunn, M Glória Pereira, Kathryn E Arnold, David Garthwaite, Colin D Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dietary Risk of Neonicotinoids and Other Pesticides in Mexican Children Residing in Agroindustrial Zones.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Experimental evidence for neonicotinoid driven decline in aquatic emerging insects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rosie J LennonDepartment of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9400-9708
Nick J B IsaacCentre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, England, United Kingdom.
Richard F ShoreCentre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, England, United Kingdom.
Will J PeachRSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, Bedfordshire, England, United Kingdom.
Jenny C DunnSchool of Life Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6277-2781
M Glória PereiraCentre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, England, United Kingdom.
Kathryn E ArnoldDepartment of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, England, United Kingdom.
David GarthwaiteFera Science Ltd., National Agri-food Innovation Campus, Sand Hutton, York, England, United Kingdom.
Colin D BrownDepartment of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, England, United Kingdom.
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · GBUniversity of York · GBFera Science (United Kingdom) · GBRoyal Society for the Protection of Birds · GBUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, a new group of systemic insecticides-the neonicotinoids-has gained prominence in arable systems, and their application globally has risen year on year. Previous modelling studies using long-term data have suggested that neonicotinoid application has had a detrimental impact on bird populations, but these studies were either limited to a single species or neglected to analyse specific exposure pathways in conjunction with observed population trends. Using bird abundance data, neonicotinoid usage records and cropping data for England at a 5x5 km resolution, generalised linear mixed models were used to test for spatio-temporal associations between neonicotinoid use and changes in the populations of 22 farmland bird species between 1994 and 2014, and to determine whether any associations were explained by dietary preferences. We assigned farmland bird species to three categories of dietary exposure to neonicotinoids based on literature data for species diets and neonicotinoid residues present in dietary items. Significant estimates of neonicotinoid-related population change were obtained for 13 of the 22 species (9 positive effects, 4 negative effects). Model estimates for individual species were not collectively explained by dietary risk categories, so dietary exposure to neonicotinoids via ingestion of treated seeds and seedlings could not be confirmed as a causal factor in farmland bird declines. Although it is not possible to infer any generic effect of dietary exposure to neonicotinoids on farmland bird populations, our analysis identifies three species with significant negative estimates that may warrant further research (house sparrow Passer domesticus, skylark Alauda arvensis and red-legged partridge Alectoris rufa). We conclude that there was either no consistent effect of dietary exposure to neonicotinoids on farmland bird populations in England, or that any over-arching effect was not detectable using our study design. The potential for indirect effects of insecticide use on bird populations via reduced food availability was not considered here and should be a focus for future research.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringSparrowsAnimalsDietary ExposureEnglandFarmsHumansImidazolesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPopulation ControlImidazolesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro Compounds

Identifiers

PMID31574132
PMCPMC6772096
OpenAlexW2979168847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.