Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31573927›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2019

A Collaboration Between Game Developers and Rehabilitation Researchers to Develop a Web-Based App for Persons With Physical Disabilities: Case Study.

Alexandra L Terrill, Justin J MacKenzie, Maija Reblin, Jackie Einerson, Jesse Ferraro, Roger Altizer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra L TerrillDepartment of Occupational & Recreational Therapies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2698-7435
Justin J MacKenzieDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2314-917X
Maija ReblinDepartment of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-465X
Jackie EinersonDepartment of Occupational & Recreational Therapies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5364-5887
Jesse FerraroEntertainment Arts and Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9642-5999
Roger AltizerEntertainment Arts and Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-1912

Funding

University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with a disability and their partners, who often provide care, are both at risk for depression and lower quality of life. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions are promising to address barriers to mental health care. Rehabilitation researchers and software development researchers must collaborate effectively with each other and with clinical and patient stakeholders to ensure successful mHealth development.

objectiveThis study aimed to aid researchers interested in mHealth software development by describing the collaborative process between a team of rehabilitation researchers, software development researchers, and stakeholders. Thus, we provide a framework (conceptual model) for other teams to replicate to build a Web-based mHealth app for individuals with physical disability.

methodsRehabilitation researchers, software development researchers, and stakeholders (people with physical disabilities and clinicians) are involved in an iterative software development process. The overall process of developing an mHealth intervention includes initial development meetings and a co-design method called design box, in which the needs and key elements of the app are discussed. On the basis of the objectives outlined, a prototype is developed and goes through scoping iterations with feedback from stakeholders and end users. The prototype is then tested by users to identify technical errors and gather feedback on usability and accessibility.

resultsIllustrating the overall development process, we present a case study based on our experience developing an app (SupportGroove) for couples coping with spinal cord injury. Examples of how we addressed specific challenges are also included. For example, feedback from stakeholders resulted in development of app features for individuals with limited functional ability. Initial designs lacked accessibility design principles made visible by end users. Solutions included large text, single click, and minimal scrolling to facilitate menu navigation for individuals using eye gaze technology. Prototype testing allowed further refinement and demonstrated high usability and engagement with activities in the app. Qualitative feedback indicated high levels of satisfaction, accessibility, and confidence in potential utility. We also present key lessons learned about working in a collaborative interdisciplinary team.

conclusionsmHealth promises to help overcome barriers to mental health intervention access. However, the development of these interventions can be challenging because of the disparate and often siloed expertise required. By describing the mHealth software development process and illustrating it with a successful case study of rehabilitation researchers, software development researchers, and stakeholders collaborating effectively, our goal is to help other teams avoid challenges we faced and benefit from our lessons learned. Ultimately, good interdisciplinary collaboration will benefit individuals with disabilities and their families.

Indexed as

interdisciplinary health teaminternetrehabilitationsoftware designspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID31573927
PMCPMC6789424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.