Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31573920›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Mobile Phone Access and Preference for Technology-Assisted Aftercare Among Low-Income Caregivers of Teens Enrolled in Outpatient Substance Use Treatment: Questionnaire Study.

Stacy R Ryan-Pettes, Lindsay L Lange, Katherine I Magnuson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ethical considerations for developing pediatric mhealth interventions for teens with socially complex needs.Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stacy R Ryan-Pettes *Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6809-198X
Lindsay L Lange *Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1367-9502
Katherine I Magnuson *Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3356-9979

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR002646 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI TSEVAT, JOEL · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImprovements in parenting practices can positively mediate the outcomes of treatment for adolescent substance use disorder. Given the high rates of release among adolescents (ie, 60% within three months and 85% within one year), there is a critical need for interventions focused on helping parents achieve and maintain effective parenting practices posttreatment. Yet, research suggests that engaging parents in aftercare services is difficult, partly due to systemic-structural and personal barriers. One way to increase parent use of aftercare services may be to offer mobile health interventions, given the potential for wide availability and on-demand access. However, it remains unclear whether mobile phone-based aftercare support for caregivers of substance-using teens is feasible or desired. Therefore, formative work in this area is needed.

objectiveThis study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of mobile phone-based aftercare support in a population of caregivers with teens in treatment for substance use.

methodsUpon enrollment in a treatment program, 103 caregivers completed a mobile phone use survey, providing information about mobile phone ownership, access, and use. Caregivers also provided a response to items assessing desire for aftercare services, in general; desire for mobile phone-based aftercare services specifically; and desire for parenting specific content as part of aftercare services. Research assistants also monitored clinic calls made to caregivers' mobile phones to provide an objective measure of the reliability of phone service.

resultsMost participants were mothers (76.7%) and self-identified as Hispanic (73.8%). The average age was 42.60 (SD 9.28) years. A total of 94% of caregivers owned a mobile phone. Most had pay-as-you-go phone service (67%), and objective data suggest this did not impede accessibility. Older caregivers more frequently had a yearly mobile contract. Further, older caregivers and caregivers of adolescent girls had fewer disconnections. Bilingual caregivers used text messaging less often; however, caregivers of adolescent girls used text messaging more often. Although 72% of caregivers reported that aftercare was needed, 91% of caregivers endorsed a desire for mobile phone-based aftercare support in parenting areas that are targets of evidence-based treatments.

conclusionsThe results suggest that mobile phones are feasible and desired to deliver treatments that provide support to caregivers of teens discharged from substance use treatment. Consideration should be given to the age of caregivers when designing these programs. Additional research is needed to better understand mobile phone use patterns based on a child's gender and among bilingual caregivers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAdultAftercareCaregiversCell PhoneFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPovertyProgram EvaluationReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and Questionnairesaftercaremhealthmobile phonesparentingsubstance use treatmenttext messaging

Identifiers

PMID31573920
PMCPMC6787533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.