Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31573836›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of sport science2020

Incorporating methods and findings from neuroscience to better understand placebo and nocebo effects in sport.

Christopher Beedie, Fabrizio Benedetti, Diletta Barbiani, Eleanora Camerone, Jacob Lindheimer, Bart Roelands

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of sport science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Impact of Verbal Suggestions on Finger Flexor Activation and Strength in Healthy Individuals.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Are there placebo or nocebo effects in balancing performance?Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Can taste be ergogenic?European journal of nutrition · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Christopher BeedieSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-3479
Fabrizio BenedettiMedicine and Physiology of Hypoxia, Plateau Rosà, Italy/Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-1150
Diletta BarbianiNeuroscience Dept, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8703-6687
Eleanora CameroneDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-2836
Jacob LindheimerDepartment of Veterans Affairs, William S. Middleton Veterans Memorial Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1581-3210
Bart RoelandsDepartment of Human Physiology, Vije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2808-044X
Ministère de la Santé et de l'Hygiène Publique · MLUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of Turin · ITUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Acute exercise tolerance among Veterans with Gulf War IllnessIK2CX001679 · VA · WM S. MIDDLETON MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSP · PI LINDHEIMER, JACOB · 2018 to 2023
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Placebo and nocebo effects are a factor in sports performance. However, the majority of published studies in sport science are descriptive and speculative regarding mechanisms. It is therefore not unreasonable for the sceptic to argue that placebo and nocebo effects in sport are illusory, and might be better explained by variations in phenomena such as motivation. It is likely that, in sport at least, placebo and nocebo effects will remain in this empirical grey area until researchers provide stronger mechanistic evidence. Recent research in neuroscience has identified a number of consistent, discrete and interacting neurobiological and physiological pathways associated with placebo and nocebo effects, with many studies reporting data of potential interest to sport scientists, for example relating to pain, fatigue and motor control. Findings suggest that placebos and nocebos result in activity of the opioid, endocannabinoid and dopamine neurotransmitter systems, brain regions including the motor cortex and striatum, and measureable effects on the autonomic nervous system. Many studies have demonstrated that placebo and nocebo effects associated with a treatment, for example an inert treatment presented as an analgesic or stimulant, exhibit mechanisms similar or identical to the verum or true treatment. Such findings suggest the possibility of a wide range of distinct placebo and nocebo mechanisms that might influence sports performance. In the present paper, we present some of the findings from neuroscience. Focussing on fatigue as an outcome and caffeine as vehicle, we propose three approaches that researchers in sport might incorporate in their studies in order to better elucidate mechanisms of placebo/nocebo effects on performance.

Indexed as

Nocebo EffectPlacebo EffectAthletic PerformanceCaffeineFatigueHumansNeural PathwaysCaffeinecaffeineexperimental designfatigueNeurobiologynocebo effectsresearch methods

Identifiers

PMID31573836
PMCPMC10181912
OpenAlexW2977964943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.