Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31573770›Full record

ArticleJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence2019

Using Bi-Weekly Surveys to Portray Adolescent Partnership Dynamics: Lessons From a Mobile Diary Study.

Rachel E Goldberg, Dawn Koffman, Marta Tienda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adolescent Partnership Quality and Emotional Health: Insights from an Intensive Longitudinal Study.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Why Digital Tools Have Not Yet Revolutionized Adolescent Health Research and What We Can Do.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel E GoldbergUniversity of California, Irvine.
Dawn KoffmanPrinceton University.
Marta TiendaPrinceton University.

Funding

Fragile Families and the Transition to AdulthoodR01HD036916 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Kathryn Edin, Jane Waldfogel · 1999 to 2026
$46.3M
GRADUATE PROGRAM IN DEMOGRAPHYT32HD007163 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 1985 to 2015
$4.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD036916NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partnership formation is an important developmental task for adolescents, but cross-sectional and periodic longitudinal studies have lacked the measurement precision to portray partnership stability and flux and to capture the range of adolescent partnership experiences. This article assesses the promises and challenges of using bi-weekly mobile diaries administered over the course of a year to study adolescent partnership dynamics. Descriptive findings illustrate the potential of bi-weekly diaries for both capturing the longitudinal complexity and fluidity of adolescent partnerships as well as for reducing retrospection biases. Results also underscore several challenges, including those posed by missing data, and highlight several strategies for maximizing participant engagement and reliably tracing adolescent partnerships.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesDiaries as TopicExpressed EmotionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMobile ApplicationsPatient ParticipationRisk-TakingSelf ReportSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31573770
PMCPMC6776247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.