ArticleJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence2019
Why Digital Tools Have Not Yet Revolutionized Adolescent Health Research and What We Can Do.
Article in Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What Is Digital Parenting? A Systematic Review of Past Measurement and Blueprint for the Future.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022Pooled it
- A multilevel meta-analysis of passive smartphone sensing of adolescent mental health.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Adolescent digital emotion regulation.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2024Review
- Ethical considerations for developing pediatric mhealth interventions for teens with socially complex needs.Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc · 2023Review
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Vaccination of Children and Adolescents: Prospects and Challenges.The Journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- A Reflection on Controversial Literature on Screen Time and Educational Apps Use in 0-5 Years Old Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- Adolescent development and growing divides in the digital age .Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2020Review
- Annual Research Review: Ecological momentary assessment studies in child psychology and psychiatry.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2020Review
- The acceptability of wearable devices for promoting adolescent mental wellbeing: A systematic review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The promise of digital tools and devices for spurring new discoveries in adolescence research is enticing. Notably, this special section draws attention to many of the advantages that mobile and wearable devices offer for ambulatory assessment research, which have now been realized. Despite such progress, digital tools have not yet delivered on their predicted revolution of adolescent health research. I offer four reasons for why digital devices have fallen short of this predicted promise. For each barrier, I suggest parallel strategies for ensuring adolescent research benefits from Ambulatory Assessment advances. To avoid being left behind, adolescence scholarship must develop in time with innovations in digital devices and platforms, which are moving forward to support basic science and interventions in mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.