Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31573359›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology2019

The regulation of chromosome segregation via centromere loops.

Josh Lawrimore, Kerry Bloom

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. DNA strand breaks at centromeres: Friend or foe?Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. It's all in the numbers: Cohesin stoichiometry.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josh LawrimoreDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kerry BloomDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Structure and Function of a Eukaryotic CentromereR37GM032238 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BLOOM, KERRY S, YEH, ELAINE YING · 2011 to 2020
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM032238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biophysical studies of the yeast centromere have shown that the organization of the centromeric chromatin plays a crucial role in maintaining proper tension between sister kinetochores during mitosis. While centromeric chromatin has traditionally been considered a simple spring, recent work reveals the centromere as a multifaceted, tunable shock absorber. Centromeres can differ from other regions of the genome in their heterochromatin state, supercoiling state, and enrichment of structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes. Each of these differences can be utilized to alter the effective stiffness of centromeric chromatin. In budding yeast, the SMC protein complexes condensin and cohesin stiffen chromatin by forming and cross-linking chromatin loops, respectively, into a fibrous structure resembling a bottlebrush. The high density of the loops compacts chromatin while spatially isolating the tension from spindle pulling forces to a subset of the chromatin. Paradoxically, the molecular crowding of chromatin via cohesin and condensin also causes an outward/poleward force. The structure allows the centromere to act as a shock absorber that buffers the variable forces generated by dynamic spindle microtubules. Based on the distribution of SMCs from bacteria to human and the conserved distance between sister kinetochores in a wide variety of organisms (0.4 to 1 micron), we propose that the bottlebrush mechanism is the foundational principle for centromere function in eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosome SegregationCohesinsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHeterochromatinHumansKinetochoresMicrotubulesMitosisMultiprotein ComplexesNeoplasmsPhylogenyAdenosine TriphosphatasesCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinscondensin complexesDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHeterochromatinMultiprotein ComplexesCentromerechromosome segregationcohesincondensinDNA loopskinetochoremitosispericentromere

Identifiers

PMID31573359
PMCPMC6856439
OpenAlexW2977467019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.