Involving People with Learning Disabilities in Guideline Development.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Community engagement in health guidelines and other normative products: a methodological review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025
   Review
2. 'We are the engine': a focus group study on clinical practice guideline development with European patient advocates for rare congenital malformations and/or intellectual disability.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025
   Article
3. Meaningful Engagement: Exploring Principles and Actions to Build Client and Caregiver Engagement Within a Community-Based Dual Diagnosis Service.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025
   Article
4. Broadening the diversity of consumers engaged in guidelines: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as