Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31572675›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2019

Development of Patient-Derived Preclinical Platform for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: PDOX and a Subsequent Organoid Model System Using Percutaneous Biopsy Samples.

Sun Il Choi, A-Ra Jeon, Min Kyeong Kim, Yu-Sun Lee, Ji Eun Im, Jung-Wook Koh, Sung-Sik Han, Sun-Young Kong, Kyong-Ah Yoon, Young-Hwan Koh and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sun Il ChoiDivision of Convergence Technology, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
A-Ra JeonDivision of Convergence Technology, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Min Kyeong KimDivision of Translational Science, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Yu-Sun LeeDivision of Convergence Technology, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Ji Eun ImDivision of Convergence Technology, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Jung-Wook KohDivision of Convergence Technology, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Sung-Sik HanCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Sun-Young KongDivision of Translational Science, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Kyong-Ah YoonCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea.
Young-Hwan KohCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Ju Hee LeeCenter for Diagnosic Oncology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Woo Jin LeeCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Sang-Jae ParkCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
En Kyung HongCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Sang Myung WooCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Yun-Hee KimDivision of Convergence Technology, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
National Cancer Center · KREwha Womans University · KRKonkuk University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most lethal malignant tumor and more than 50% patients are diagnosed at metastatic stage. The preclinical model systems that reflect the genetic heterogeneity of metastatic tumors are urgently needed to guide optimal treatment. This study describes the development of patient-derived preclinical platform using very small sized-percutaneous liver gun biopsy (PLB) of metastatic pancreatic cancer, based on patient-derived xenograft (PDX)-mediated tissue amplification and subsequent organoid generation. To increase the success rate and shorten the tumor growth period, patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model was developed to directly implant threadlike PLB samples into the pancreas. The engraftment success rate of PDOX samples from 35 patients with metastatic PDAC was 47%, with these samples showing the potential to metastasize to distant organs, as in patients. The PDOX models retained the genetic alterations and histopathological features of the primary tumors. Tumor organoids were subsequently generated from first passage cancer cells isolated from F1 tumor tissue of PDOX that preserve the epithelial cancer characteristics and KRAS mutations of primary tumors. The response to gemcitabine of PDOX-derived organoids correlated with clinical outcomes in corresponding patients as well as PDOX models

Indexed as

organoidpancreatic ductal adenocarcinomapatient-derived orthotopic xenograftpercutaneous liver biopsypreclinical cancer models

Identifiers

PMID31572675
PMCPMC6753223
OpenAlexW2969252393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.