Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31572639›Full record

ReviewCureus2019

Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Cushing's Disease: A Review.

Mirza Zain Baig, Altaf Ali Laghari, Aneela Darbar, Umm E Hani Abdullah, Sumiya Abbasi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mirza Zain BaigSurgical Oncology, Rudy L. Ruggles Biomedical Research Institute, Danbury, USA.
Altaf Ali LaghariNeurosurgery, Aga Khan University Hosiptal, Karachi, PAK.
Aneela DarbarNeurosurgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Umm E Hani AbdullahNeurosurgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Sumiya AbbasiEpidemiology, Liaquat College of Medicine & Dentistry, Karachi, PAK.
Biomedical Research Institute · USAga Khan University · PKAga Khan University Hospital · PKLiaquat National Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ever since the 1960s, transsphenoidal surgery has been the modality of choice for treating Cushing's disease. Subsequent visualization of the pituitary fossa and sphenoid sinus may be done either with the operating microscope or with the relatively new endoscope. The endoscope due to its panoramic view allows greater visualization as compared to the operating microscope. It confers greater access to the cavernous sinus, sella, suprasellar, and parasellar regions and accommodates higher magnifications. It is bi-dimensional, however as opposed to the operating microscope that provides a three-dimensional view and allows greater depth perception. This article provides a comprehensive review of the advantages and disadvantages of the endoscope and compares it to the operating microscope. We hope this article will prove useful to both clinicians and academicians alike in their approach and management of Cushing's disease.

Indexed as

cushing diseaseendoscopic endonasaloperating microscopetrans-sphenoidal surgery

Identifiers

PMID31572639
PMCPMC6760885
OpenAlexW2964592759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.