Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31572588›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2019

Antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects of grape pomace and grape seed extracts on colorectal cancer cell lines.

José M Pérez-Ortiz, Luis F Alguacil, Elisabet Salas, Isidro Hermosín-Gutiérrez, Sergio Gómez-Alonso, Carmen González-Martín

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. EvaluatingBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Red Kale (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José M Pérez-OrtizUnidad de Investigación Traslacional Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real Ciudad Real Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3588-6273
Luis F AlguacilUnidad de Investigación Traslacional Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real Ciudad Real Spain.
Elisabet SalasUnidad de Investigación Traslacional Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real Ciudad Real Spain.
Isidro Hermosín-GutiérrezInstituto Regional de Investigación Científica Aplicada (IRICA) Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha Ciudad Real Spain.
Sergio Gómez-AlonsoDepartment of food science and technology Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha Ciudad Real Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2358-6636
Carmen González-MartínUnidad de Investigación Traslacional Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real Ciudad Real Spain.
Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grape pomace is the source of bioactive compounds (anthocyanins, flavonols, flavan-3-ols, and stilbenes) which exhibit antiproliferative actions on cell cultures. We have investigated the antitumoral effects of grape pomace and grape seed extracts on colon cancer cells (Caco-2, HT-29) and fibroblasts. Crude extracts prepared from white and red pomace, and grape seeds, reduced the viability and proliferation of Caco-2. HT-29 cells were resistant to these actions. Purified extracts were then prepared from the same sources and compared with the LDH test; again, all three extracts were active and purified extract from grape seed was the most potent and specific on Caco-2 cells. HT-29 cells were more sensitive to these purified extracts. The biological activity resided almost exclusively in the flavonol and flavan-3-ols subfractions, rather than the anthocyanin subfraction. Preliminary results on the mechanisms involved in these effects revealed downregulation of Myc gene expression in HT-29 and upregulation of Ptg2 in Caco-2 cells.

Indexed as

antitumoralCaco‐2grape extractsHT‐29

Identifiers

PMID31572588
PMCPMC6766557
OpenAlexW2965527889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.