Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31572571›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2019

Amplified fragment length polymorphism and whole genome sequencing: a comparison of methods in the investigation of a nosocomial outbreak with vancomycin resistant enterococci.

Victoria A Janes, Daan W Notermans, Ingrid J B Spijkerman, Caroline E Visser, Marja E Jakobs, Robin van Houdt, Rob J L Willems, Menno D de Jong, Constance Schultsz, Sébastien Matamoros

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Victoria A Janes1Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6574-1449
Daan W Notermans1Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ingrid J B Spijkerman1Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline E Visser1Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marja E Jakobs2Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Clinical Genetics, Core Facility Genomics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robin van Houdt3Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rob J L Willems4Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Menno D de Jong1Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Constance Schultsz1Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sébastien Matamoros1Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recognition of nosocomial outbreaks with antimicrobial resistant (AMR) pathogens and appropriate infection prevention measures are essential to limit the consequences of AMR pathogens to patients in hospitals. Because unrelated, but genetically similar AMR pathogens may circulate simultaneously, rapid high-resolution molecular typing methods are needed for outbreak management. We compared amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) during a nosocomial outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Methods: Hierarchical clustering of AFLP profiles was performed using unweighted pair-grouping and similarity coefficients were calculated with Pearson correlation. For WGS-analysis, core single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used to calculate the pairwise distance between isolates, construct a maximum likelihood phylogeny and establish a cut-off for relatedness of epidemiologically linked VRE isolates. SNP-variations in the Results: Of the 721 patients screened for VRE carriage, AFLP assigned isolates of 22 patients to the outbreak cluster. According to WGS, all 22 isolates belonged to ST117 but only 21 grouped in a tight phylogenetic cluster and carried Conclusion: AFLP was a rapid and affordable screening tool for characterising hospital VRE outbreaks. For in-depth understanding of the outbreak WGS was needed. Compared to AFLP, WGS provided higher resolution typing of VRE isolates with implications for outbreak management.

Indexed as

Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisBacterial ProteinsCarrier StateCluster AnalysisCross InfectionDisease OutbreaksEnterococcus faeciumGenome, BacterialGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansMolecular TypingPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersTime FactorsBacterial ProteinsVanB protein, EnterococcusAFLPMolecular typingNosocomial outbreakVREWGS

Identifiers

PMID31572571
PMCPMC6757385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.