Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31572352›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2019

Systematic Assessment of Immune Marker Variation in Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Cate Speake, Henry T Bahnson, Johnna D Wesley, Nikole Perdue, David Friedrich, Minh N Pham, Erinn Lanxon-Cookson, William W Kwok, Birgit Sehested Hansen, Matthias von Herrath and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cate SpeakeBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, United States.
Henry T BahnsonBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, United States.
Johnna D WesleyNovo Nordisk Research Center Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
Nikole PerdueNovo Nordisk Research Center Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
David FriedrichNovo Nordisk Research Center Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
Minh N PhamNovo Nordisk Research Center Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
Erinn Lanxon-CooksonNovo Nordisk Research Center Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
William W KwokBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, United States.
Birgit Sehested HansenClinical Development, Novo Nordisk A/S, Soborg, Denmark.
Matthias von HerrathNovo Nordisk Research Center Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
Carla J GreenbaumBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, United States.
Novo Nordisk (United States) · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · USBenaroya Research InstituteNovo Nordisk (Denmark) · DK

Funding

Immune Tolerance Network UM1 2023 SupplementUM1AI109565 · NIAID · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI Mark S Anderson, Jane Hoyt Buckner · 2014 to 2026
$451.6M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI109565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune analytes have been widely tested in efforts to understand the heterogeneity of disease progression, risk, and therapeutic responses in type 1 diabetes (T1D). The future clinical utility of such analytes as biomarkers depends on their technical and biological variability, as well as their correlation with clinical outcomes. To assess the variability of a panel of 91 immune analytes, we conducted a prospective study of adults with T1D (<3 years from diagnosis), at 9-10 visits over 1 year. Autoantibodies and frequencies of T-cell, natural killer cell, and myeloid subsets were evaluated; autoreactive T-cell frequencies and function were also measured. We calculated an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each marker, which is a relative measure of between- and within-subject variability. Of the 91 analytes tested, we identified 35 with high between- and low within-subject variability, indicating their potential ability to be used to stratify subjects. We also provide extensive data regarding technical variability for 64 of the 91 analytes. To pilot the concept that ICC can be used to identify analytes that reflect biological outcomes, the association between each immune analyte and C-peptide was also evaluated using partial least squares modeling. CD8 effector memory T-cell (CD8 EM) frequency exhibited a high ICC and a positive correlation with C-peptide, which was also seen in an independent dataset of recent-onset T1D subjects. More work is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying this relationship. Here we find that there are a limited number of technically reproducible immune analytes that also have a high ICC. We propose the use of ICC to define within- and between-subject variability and measurement of technical variability for future biomarker identification studies. Employing such a method is critical for selection of analytes to be tested in the context of future clinical trials aiming to understand heterogeneity in disease progression and response to therapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesC-PeptideDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansImmunologic MemoryKiller Cells, NaturalLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMyeloid CellsAutoantibodiesBiomarkersC-Peptideclinical trialsimmune assaysinsulin secretiontype 1 diabetesvariability

Identifiers

PMID31572352
PMCPMC6753618
OpenAlexW2967131275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.