Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31572204›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2019

Principles of Optogenetic Methods and Their Application to Cardiac Experimental Systems.

Emily A Ferenczi, Xiaoqiu Tan, Christopher L-H Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Application of Optogenetics in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cardiac optogenetics: shining light on signaling pathways.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Photonic Nanojet-Mediated Optogenetics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Emily A FerencziDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Xiaoqiu TanKey Laboratory of Medical Electrophysiology, Ministry of Education and Medical Electrophysiological Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Christopher L-H HuangPhysiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USPhysiological Society · GBSouthwest Medical University · CN

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M001288/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optogenetic techniques permit studies of excitable tissue through genetically expressed light-gated microbial channels or pumps permitting transmembrane ion movement. Light activation of these proteins modulates cellular excitability with millisecond precision. This review summarizes optogenetic approaches, using examples from neurobiological applications, and then explores their application in cardiac electrophysiology. We review the

Indexed as

archaerhodopsincardiac electrophysiologychannelrhodopsinhalorhodopsinlight deliveryopsin selectionoptogeneticsphysiological readout

Identifiers

PMID31572204
PMCPMC6749684
OpenAlexW2965110959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.