ArticleCancer management and research2019
Clinical results of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 250 patients with cervical and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radical surgery versus definitive radiotherapy in treatment of locoregional upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Effects of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on survival benefits and poor prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis should not be defined as regional lymph node metastasis in cervical and upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Dose escalation in radical radio(chemo)therapy for cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer with 3DCRT/IMRT (ChC&UES): a multicenter retrospective study.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- The Application of Nimotuzumab Combined With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Toward the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Esophageal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Long-term survival of an unresectable upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with severe dysphagia following nasogastric tube feeding and camrelizumab-containing therapy: a case report.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate and analyze the efficacy and prognostic factors of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in 250 patients with cervical and upper esophageal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND
methodsFrom September 2009 to September 2016, we retrospectively analyzed 250 patients with cervical and upper esophageal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). In our study, all patients received IMRT, 54 patients with cervical esophageal carcinoma and 196 patients with upper esophageal carcinoma. Treatment response, survival status and failure modes of treatment were observed, and prognostic factors were analyzed.
resultsThe median survival time was 22.60 months and 3-year survival rate was 42%. The median progress-free survival time was 14.52 months and 3-year progress-free survival rate was 29.3%. The median survival time and the median progress-free survival time for cervical esophageal carcinoma were 20.40 and 15.15 months, respectively. The median survival time and the median progress-free survival time for upper esophageal carcinoma were 25.80 and 14.52 months, respectively (
conclusionIn this study, IMRT demonstrated clinical benefit and well-tolerated toxicity in patients with cervical and upper esophageal carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.