ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2019
Toxicity screening of two prevalent metal organic frameworks for therapeutic use in human lung epithelial cells.
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unlocking the door for synergizing expansion-capacity in Si anodes: breathable flexible MOFs.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Toxicity Challenges and Current Advancement in Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) for Biomedical Applications.Biological trace element research · 2026Review
- Importance of control experiments in toxicity test of metal-organic frameworks: Recent advances and challenges.Eco-Environment & Health · 2025Review
- Recent Advancements in Metal-Organic Framework-Based Microfluidic Chips for Biomedical Applications.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Metal-organic frameworks in drug delivery: engineering versatile platforms for therapeutic applications.RSC advances · 2024Review
- Tumor Targeting with Apatinib-loaded Nanoparticles and Sonodynamic Combined Therapy.Current molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Low Toxicity of Metal-Organic Framework MOF-74(Co) Nano-Particles In Vitro and In Vivo.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Research on the Effect of Physicochemical Properties on the Cytotoxicity of Metal-Organic Frameworks.Small science · 2022Article
- The uptake of metal-organic frameworks: a journey into the cell.Chemical Society reviews · 2022Review
- Acute Toxicity of Cu-MOF Nanoparticles (nanoHKUST-1) towards Embryos and Adult Zebrafish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Thin Films of Metal-Organic Framework Interfaces Obtained by Laser Evaporation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An investigation of affecting factors on MOF characteristics for biomedical applications: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2021Review
- Evaluating UiO-66 Metal-Organic Framework Nanoparticles as Acid-Sensitive Carriers for Pulmonary Drug Delivery Applications.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe flexibility and tunability of metal organic frameworks (MOFs), crystalline porous materials composed of a network of metal ions coordinated by organic ligands, confer their variety of applications as drug delivery systems or as sensing and imaging agents. However, such properties also add to the difficulty in ensuring their safe implementation when interaction with biological systems is considered.
methodsIn the current study, we used real-time sensorial strategies and cellular-based approaches to allow for fast and effective screening of two MOFs of prevalent use, namely, MIL-160 representative of a hydrophilic and ZIF-8 representative of a hydrophobic framework. The two MOFs were synthesized "in house" and exposed to human bronchial epithelial (BEAS-2B) cells, a pertinent toxicological screening model.
resultsAnalysis allowed evaluation and differentiation of particle-induced cellular effects as well identification of different degrees and routes of toxicity, all in a high-throughput manner. Our results show the importance of performing screening toxicity assessments before introducing MOFs to biomedical applications. DISCUSSION: Our proposed screening assays could be extended to a wider variety of cell lines to allow for identification of any deleterious effects of MOFs, with the range of toxic mechanisms to be differentiated based on cell viability, morphology and cell-substrate interactions, respectively.
conclusionOur analysis highlights the importance of considering the physicochemical properties of MOFs when recommending a MOF-based therapeutic option or MOFs implementation in biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.