Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31571814›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes.

João Coelho, Luísa Malheiro, João Melo Beirão, Angelina Meireles, Bernardete Pessoa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

João CoelhoUnit of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2261-5682
Luísa MalheiroUnit of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9937-6806
João Melo BeirãoUnit of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Angelina MeirelesUnit of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9148-2786
Bernardete PessoaUnit of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5673-1561
Universidade do Porto · PTCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term real-world effectiveness of FAc and DEX implants in vitrectomized DME eyes in a real-world setting.

methodsThis was a non-interventional, retrospective, comparative study of 46 vitrectomized eyes in 33 patients with persistent or recurrent DME quantified best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) over up to 37 months.

resultsBoth FAc and DEX treatment led to statistically and clinically significant improvements in BCVA and CFT. FAc >10-letter improvement on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] chart over months 3-24 and a sustained ~200 µm CFT reduction over months 1-24; DEX: >5-letter improvement on the ETDRS chart at months 1 and 3 and >100 µm CFT reduction at month 1. FAc demonstrated sustained, stable and predictable effects on BCVA and CFT over 24 months and also improved BCVA and decreased CFT in a cohort of DME eyes that was refractory to DEX over 6 months.

conclusionThis real-world study demonstrates long-term effectiveness of FAc in vitrectomized DME eyes and sustained effectiveness in DME eyes that did not respond to DEX therapy.

Indexed as

dexamethasone implantdiabetic macular edemafluocinolone acetonideintravitreal implantsreal-worldvitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID31571814
PMCPMC6750204
OpenAlexW2971689770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.