Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31571728›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2019

Pharmacodynamic assessment of

Megan Grobman, Kaitlin A Bishop, Hansjorg Rindt, Laura A Nafe, Carol R Reinero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan GrobmanDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, 900 East Campus Drive, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA (Grobman, Bishop, Rindt, Reinero); Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-2042, USA (Nafe).
Kaitlin A BishopDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, 900 East Campus Drive, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA (Grobman, Bishop, Rindt, Reinero); Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-2042, USA (Nafe).
Hansjorg RindtDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, 900 East Campus Drive, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA (Grobman, Bishop, Rindt, Reinero); Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-2042, USA (Nafe).
Laura A NafeDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, 900 East Campus Drive, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA (Grobman, Bishop, Rindt, Reinero); Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-2042, USA (Nafe).
Carol R ReineroDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, 900 East Campus Drive, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA (Grobman, Bishop, Rindt, Reinero); Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-2042, USA (Nafe).
Oklahoma State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of understanding of specific immune defects underlying canine immune-mediated diseases hampers optimal therapy. Failure to tailor treatment to an individual's immune abnormality can result in lack of efficacy, secondary complications, added expense, and drug-potentiated adverse effects. We adopted a small-volume whole-blood flow cytometric assay to determine the effect of immunosuppressant drugs on T-lymphocyte proliferation. Using healthy dogs in this proof-of-principle study, we hypothesized that there would be dose-dependent suppression of T-lymphocyte proliferation in response to dexamethasone, cyclosporine, mycophenolic acid, and the active metabolite of leflunomide (A77 1726). Whole blood was collected from 6 healthy pet dogs and incubated for 4 d with or without the mitogens concanavalin A and lipopolysaccharide and with increasing concentrations of immunosuppressant. Samples were subsequently stained with viability dye and with antibodies against the pan-T-lymphocyte marker CD5 and the cell proliferation marker Ki67. Percentages of proliferating T-lymphocytes were determined by flow cytometry, and the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC

Indexed as

DogsAnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCD5 AntigensCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCyclosporineDexamethasoneEnzyme InhibitorsImmunosuppressive AgentsKi-67 AntigenLeflunomideMycophenolic AcidT-LymphocytesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCD5 AntigensCyclosporineDexamethasoneEnzyme InhibitorsImmunosuppressive AgentsKi-67 AntigenLeflunomideMycophenolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID31571728
PMCPMC6753887
OpenAlexW2986655723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.