Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31571662›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2020

Protein microarray analysis of cytokine expression changes in distal stumps after sciatic nerve transection.

Xiao-Qing Cheng, Xue-Zhen Liang, Shuai Wei, Xiao Ding, Gong-Hai Han, Ping Liu, Xun Sun, Qi Quan, He Tang, Qing Zhao and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neuropathic Itch.Cells · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-Qing ChengBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xue-Zhen LiangBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing; The First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Shuai WeiBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiao DingBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Gong-Hai HanBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ping LiuBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xun SunBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qi QuanBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
He TangBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qing ZhaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ai-Jia ShangCo-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province; Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiang PengBeijing Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine in Orthopedics, Institute of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing; Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNNantong University · CNShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large number of chemokines, cytokines, other trophic factors and the extracellular matrix molecules form a favorable microenvironment for peripheral nerve regeneration. This microenvironment is one of the major factors for regenerative success. Therefore, it is important to investigate the key molecules and regulators affecting nerve regeneration after peripheral nerve injury. However, the identities of specific cytokines at various time points after sciatic nerve injury have not been determined. The study was performed by transecting the sciatic nerve to establish a model of peripheral nerve injury and to analyze, by protein microarray, the expression of different cytokines in the distal nerve after injury. Results showed a large number of cytokines were up-regulated at different time points post injury and several cytokines, e.g., ciliary neurotrophic factor, were downregulated. The construction of a protein-protein interaction network was used to screen how the proteins interacted with differentially expressed cytokines. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway and Gene ontology analyses indicated that the differentially expressed cytokines were significantly associated with chemokine signaling pathways, Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B, and notch signaling pathway. The cytokines involved in inflammation, immune response and cell chemotaxis were up-regulated initially and the cytokines involved in neuronal apoptotic processes, cell-cell adhesion, and cell proliferation were up-regulated at 28 days after injury. Western blot analysis showed that the expression and changes of hepatocyte growth factor, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and ciliary neurotrophic factor were consistent with the results of protein microarray analysis. The results provide a comprehensive understanding of changes in cytokine expression and changes in these cytokines and classical signaling pathways and biological functions during Wallerian degeneration, as well as a basis for potential treatments of peripheral nerve injury. The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, China (approval number: 2016-x9-07) in September 2016.

Indexed as

cytokinesdistal stumpgene ontologyKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathwayperipheral nerve injuryprotein microarrayprotein-protein interaction networkWallerian degeneration

Identifiers

PMID31571662
PMCPMC6921340
OpenAlexW2975549643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.