ArticleInternational wound journal2019
Epidermal growth factor vs platelet-rich plasma: Activity against chronic wound microbiota.
Article in International wound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Notable correlation between serum epidermal growth factor values and inflammatory status in patients with COVID-19.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Observational
- Host-Microbiome Crosstalk in Chronic Wound Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Effectiveness of Epidermal Growth Factor Loaded Carboxymethylcellulose (EGF-CMC) Hydrogel in Biofilm Formation in Wounds of Diabetic Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Use of platelet concentrate gel in second-intention wound healing: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2021Article
- The History of Methicillin-ResistantThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2020Review
- Epidermal growth factor vs platelet-rich plasma: Activity against chronic wound microbiota.International wound journal · 2019Article
- A Comparative Study on Therapeutic Efficacy of Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma, Autologous Platelet-rich Fibrin Matrix, Recombinant Human Epidermal Growth Factor, and Collagen Particles in Nonhealing Leg Ulcers.Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The objective was to evaluate Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation of wounds treated with recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP); to analyse the susceptibility profiles of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa isolates from wounds treated with EGF and PRP; and to describe the presence of infection in EGF-treated and PRP-treated wounds. Experimental study was performed using clinical specimens collected with swabs. Patients were treated with PRP and EGF in the outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Forty-three isolates were obtained from 31 patients, 41.9% (13/31) of whom had been treated with EGF and 58.0% (18/31) with PRP. Ten of the 43 isolates were identified as S. aureus, 60.0% (6/10) of which were isolated from PRP-treated wounds. Among the 33 P. aeruginosa isolates, 66.6% (22/33) were isolated from PRP-treated wounds. Regarding antimicrobial susceptibility, only one strain isolated from an EGF-treated wound was identified as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Among the P. aeruginosa isolates, one obtained from a patient treated with EGF was multidrug-resistant. Patients treated with EGF had no infections during the follow-up period, and there was a significant difference between the 1st and 12th week in wound infection improvement in patients treated with PRP (P = .0078).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.