ArticleProteins2019
Introducing "best single template" models as reference baseline for the Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO).
Article in Proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure Modeling Protocols for Protein Multimer and RNA in CASP16 With Enhanced MSAs, Model Ranking, and Deep Learning.Proteins · 2026Article
- Beyond Single Chains: Benchmarking Macromolecular Complex Prediction Methods With the Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO).Proteins · 2026Article
- Assisting and accelerating NMR assignment with restrained structure prediction.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Assessing interface accuracy in macromolecular complexes.PloS one · 2025Article
- DockQ v2: improved automatic quality measure for protein multimers, nucleic acids, and small molecules.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- AI-Driven Deep Learning Techniques in Protein Structure Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Immunoinformatics design of a structural proteins driven multi-epitope candidate vaccine against different SARS-CoV-2 variants based on fynomer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An interactive visualization tool for educational outreach in protein contact map overlap analysis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Performances of the Protein Modeling Techniques Participating in CASP15 Using a Structure-Based Functional Site Prediction Approach: ResiRole.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Illuminating the "Twilight Zone": Advances in Difficult Protein Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- DisCovER: distance- and orientation-based covariational threading for weakly homologous proteins.Proteins · 2022Article
- Building Structural Models of a Whole Mycoplasma Cell.Journal of molecular biology · 2022Article
- Predicted 3D model of the M protein of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus and analysis of its immunogenic potential.PloS one · 2022Article
- A Molecular Docking Study of Human STEAP2 for the Discovery of New Potential Anti-Prostate Cancer Chemotherapeutic Candidates.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO)-Perspectives on the future of fully automated evaluation of structure prediction methods.Proteins · 2021Article
- Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Article
- Complementing sequence-derived features with structural information extracted from fragment libraries for protein structure prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Recent Advances in Protein Homology Detection Propelled by Inter-Residue Interaction Map Threading.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- The Protein Data Bank Archive.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Critical blind assessment of structure prediction techniques is crucial for the scientific community to establish the state of the art, identify bottlenecks, and guide future developments. In Critical Assessment of Techniques in Structure Prediction (CASP), human experts assess the performance of participating methods in relation to the difficulty of the prediction task in a biennial experiment on approximately 100 targets. Yet, the development of automated computational modeling methods requires more frequent evaluation cycles and larger sets of data. The "Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO)" platform complements CASP by conducting fully automated blind prediction evaluations based on the weekly pre-release of sequences of those structures, which are going to be published in the next release of the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Each week, CAMEO publishes benchmarking results for predictions corresponding to a set of about 20 targets collected during a 4-day prediction window. CAMEO benchmarking data are generated consistently for all methods at the same point in time, enabling developers to cross-validate their method's performance, and referring to their results in publications. Many successful participants of CASP have used CAMEO-either by directly benchmarking their methods within the system or by comparing their own performance to CAMEO reference data. CAMEO offers a variety of scores reflecting different aspects of structure modeling, for example, binding site accuracy, homo-oligomer interface quality, or accuracy of local model confidence estimates. By introducing the "bestSingleTemplate" method based on structure superpositions as a reference for the accuracy of 3D modeling predictions, CAMEO facilitates objective comparison of techniques and fosters the development of advanced methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.