Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31571225›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2019

Impact of tumor size and nodal status on recurrence of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2 cm after curative resection: A multi-institutional study of 392 cases.

Ding-Hui Dong, Xu-Feng Zhang, George Poultsides, Flavio Rocha, Sharon Weber, Ryan Fields, Kamran Idrees, Cliff Cho, Shishir K Maithel, Timothy M Pawlik and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Size alone is not enough: Ki-67 and invasion patterns identify high-risk pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Response to Commentary "Are Parenchyma-Sparing Resections Really Appropriate for Small (<3 cm) Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors?"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  11. Comment on: Are Parenchyma-Sparing Resections Really Appropriate for Small (<3 cm) Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors?Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical Prognosticators of Metastatic Potential in Patients with Small Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Ding-Hui DongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xu-Feng ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4483-7326
George PoultsidesDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Flavio RochaDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-5796
Sharon WeberDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Ryan FieldsDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Kamran IdreesDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Cliff ChoDivision of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Shishir K MaithelDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Timothy M PawlikDivision of Surgical Oncology, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-9870
other members of the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USEmory University · USFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNStanford University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USVanderbilt University · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current study sought to define the impact of lymph node metastasis (LNM) relative to tumor size on tumor recurrence after curative resection for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) ≤2 cm.

methodsPatients who underwent curative resection for ≤2-cm NF-pNETs were identified from a multi-institutional database. Risk factors associated with tumor recurrence as well as LNM were identified. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared among patients with or without LNM.

resultsA total of 392 ≤2-cm NF-pNETs patients were identified. Among the 328 patients who had lymph node dissection and evaluation, 42 (12.8%) patients had LNM. LNM was associated with tumor recurrence (hazard ratio, 3.06; P = .026) after surgery. RFS was worse among LNM vs no LNM patients (5-year RFS, 81.7% vs 94.1%; P = .019). Patients with tumors measuring 1.5-2 cm had a two-fold increase in the incidence of LNM vs patients with tumors <1.5 cm (17.9% vs 8.7%, odds ratio, 2.59; P = .022), as well as a higher risk of advanced tumor grade and higher Ki-67 levels (both P < .01). After curative resection, a total of 14 (8.0%) patients with a tumor of 1.5-2 cm and 10 (4.5%) patients with tumor <1.5 cm developed tumor recurrence.

conclusionSurgical resection with lymphadenectomy should be considered for patients with NF-pNETs ≥1.5-2.0 cm.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSurvival RateTumor Burdenlymph node metastasisneuroendocrine tumorpancreassurgerytumor size

Identifiers

PMID31571225
PMCPMC10178766
OpenAlexW2979248989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.