Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31571035›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2020

Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors (with video).

Ippei Matsuzaki, Masashi Hattori, Hiroki Yamauchi, Naoya Goto, Yuji Iwata, Takio Yokoi, Mafu Tsunemi, Makoto Kobayashi, Takeshi Yamamura, Ryoji Miyahara

Abstract readClinical TrialVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Experimental study of magnetic hydrogel assisted magnetic anchorguided endoscopic submucosal dissection in colonic tumors.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ippei MatsuzakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yamashita Hospital, 1-3-5 Nakamachi, Ichinomiya, Aichi, 491-8531, Japan.
Masashi HattoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yamashita Hospital, 1-3-5 Nakamachi, Ichinomiya, Aichi, 491-8531, Japan. m.hattori@yamashita.or.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4021-1051
Hiroki YamauchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yamashita Hospital, 1-3-5 Nakamachi, Ichinomiya, Aichi, 491-8531, Japan.
Naoya GotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yamashita Hospital, 1-3-5 Nakamachi, Ichinomiya, Aichi, 491-8531, Japan.
Yuji IwataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yamashita Hospital, 1-3-5 Nakamachi, Ichinomiya, Aichi, 491-8531, Japan.
Takio YokoiDepartment of Pathology, Yamashita Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan.
Mafu TsunemiDepartment of Nursing, Yamashita Hospital, Ichinomiya, Japan.
Makoto KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi, Japan.
Takeshi YamamuraDepartment of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryoji MiyaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe feasibility of magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection (MAG-ESD) using a neodymium magnet for colorectal tumors has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to clarify the feasibility of MAG-ESD for colorectal tumors.

methodsThis prospective trial was conducted at Yamashita Hospital. MAG-ESD was performed for 49 colorectal tumors. The magnetic anchor comprised an internal magnet attached to an endoclip with 3-0 silk. Both external and internal magnets were made using neodymium magnets. The feasibility of traction achieved using MAG-ESD, en bloc resection rate, complete en bloc resection rate, time required for preparation and attachment of the magnetic anchor, procedure time, rate of retrieval of magnetic anchors, and adverse events were evaluated.

resultsMAG-ESDs were successfully performed for 48 colorectal tumors except for a rectal case in which the internal magnet stuck to the endoscope. En bloc resections and complete en bloc resections were achieved in all cases. Attaching the magnetic anchor required a median of 8 min (range 3-37 min). Median procedure time was 76 min (range 28-283 min) and the magnetic anchors were retrieved in all cases without adverse events.

conclusionMAG-ESD is feasible and safe in the colon and may facilitate the treatment of all difficult lesions. (UMIN000024100).

Indexed as

MagnetsAdenocarcinomaAdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeodymiumPatient SafetyProspective StudiesNeodymiumEndoscopic submucosal dissectionMAG-ESDMagnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.