Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31570937›Full record

ReviewClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2020

Scrub Typhus and the Misconception of Doxycycline Resistance.

Tri Wangrangsimakul, Weerawat Phuklia, Paul N Newton, Allen L Richards, Nicholas P J Day

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Antibiotic Antagonism inInfection & chemotherapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Scrub typhus, a salient threat: Needs attention.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of Lethal and Nonlethal Mouse Models ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The neglected challenge: Vaccination against rickettsiae.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020
    Review
  18. Reply to Watt.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Vector-borne diseases in pregnancy.Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Tri WangrangsimakulMahidol -Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Weerawat PhukliaLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit, Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Paul N NewtonMahidol -Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Allen L RichardsDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Nicholas P J DayMahidol -Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahidol University · THMahosot Hospital · LAUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scrub typhus, a neglected infectious disease caused by the obligate intracellular bacterium Orientia tsutsugamushi, is a major cause of fever across the Asia Pacific region with more than a billion people at risk. Treatment with antibiotics such as doxycycline or chloramphenicol is effective for the majority of patients. In the 1990s, reports from northern Thailand raised a troubling observation; some scrub typhus patients responded poorly to doxycycline, which investigators attributed to doxycycline resistance. Despite the controversial nature of these reports, independent verification was neglected, with subsequent studies speculating on the role of doxycycline resistance in contributing to failure of treatment or prophylaxis. In this review, we have outlined the evidence for drug-resistant Orientia tsutsugamushi, assessed the evidence for doxycycline resistance, and highlight more recent findings unsupportive of doxycycline resistance. We conclude that doxycycline resistance is a misconception, with treatment outcome likely to be determined by other bacterial, host, and pharmacological factors.

Indexed as

Orientia tsutsugamushiScrub TyphusAnti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclineHumansThailandAnti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclinedoxycyclineOrientia tsutsugamushiresistancescrub typhustreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID31570937
PMCPMC7245148
OpenAlexW2978997058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.