Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31570930›Full record

SynthesisTranslational behavioral medicine2019

The introduction of new food retail opportunities in lower-income communities and the impact on fruit and vegetable intake: a systematic review.

Kelseanna Hollis-Hansen, Leah Vermont, Michelle L Zafron, Jennifer Seidman, Lucia Leone

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational behavioral medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Balancing Mission and Margins: What Makes Healthy Community Food Stores Successful.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelseanna Hollis-HansenDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Leah VermontDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Michelle L ZafronUniversity Libraries, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Jennifer SeidmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Lucia LeoneDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

Effectiveness and Implementation of a Research Tested Mobile Produce Market Designed to Improve Diet in Underserved CommunitiesR37CA215232 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LEONE, LUCIA A · 2018 to 2024
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA215232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of access to fresh fruits and vegetables (F&Vs) is associated with consumption of fewer F&Vs and higher risk of obesity, especially for lower-income individuals. It is widely believed that the addition of new food retail opportunities could improve F&V consumption and subsequently reduce the chronic disease burden. Observational studies provide some support for these hypotheses, but contradictions exist. In this study we sought to examine if the introduction of a food retailer affects F&V consumption in lower-income communities. We used a systematic PRISMA approach to conduct this study. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses for academic journal references and gray literature published before August 2018. Included studies were those looking at the effect of the introduction of a new food retailer on F&V consumption. Studies were also categorized based on which dimensions of food access were targeted by the food retailer. We identified 15 studies meeting inclusion criteria: 11 studies reported a positive increase in F&V consumption attributable to the introduction of a new food retailer, of which 6 were statistically significant. The remaining 4 studies, all of which examined the impact of introducing a new retail supermarket, showed no change or a decrease in F&V intake. Results from studies which change the food environment generally support the idea that increased access to healthy food improves diet, but more studies are needed in order to assess the differences between the various types of retailers, and to identify strategies for improving impact. Understanding which types of new food retail programs are most likely to impact diet has implications for policies which incentivize new food retail.

Indexed as

CommerceFeeding BehaviorFood SupplyFruitPovertyVegetablesDietHumansDiet outcomesFood accessFood interventionsFood retail

Identifiers

PMID31570930
PMCPMC8679116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.