Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31570887›Full record

ReviewNature methods2019

ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis.

Stuart Berg, Dominik Kutra, Thorben Kroeger, Christoph N Straehle, Bernhard X Kausler, Carsten Haubold, Martin Schiegg, Janez Ales, Thorsten Beier, Markus Rudy and 9 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,712 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,712citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,712 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,652 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Stuart BergHHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.
Dominik KutraHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thorben KroegerHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph N StraehleHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bernhard X KauslerHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Carsten HauboldHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin SchieggHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Janez AlesHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thorsten BeierHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus RudyHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kemal ErenHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jaime I CervantesHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Buote XuHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fynn BeuttenmuellerHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Adrian WolnyHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chong ZhangHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ullrich KoetheHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fred A HamprechtHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. fred.hamprecht@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de.
Anna KreshukHCI/IWR, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. anna.kreshuk@embl.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present ilastik, an easy-to-use interactive tool that brings machine-learning-based (bio)image analysis to end users without substantial computational expertise. It contains pre-defined workflows for image segmentation, object classification, counting and tracking. Users adapt the workflows to the problem at hand by interactively providing sparse training annotations for a nonlinear classifier. ilastik can process data in up to five dimensions (3D, time and number of channels). Its computational back end runs operations on-demand wherever possible, allowing for interactive prediction on data larger than RAM. Once the classifiers are trained, ilastik workflows can be applied to new data from the command line without further user interaction. We describe all ilastik workflows in detail, including three case studies and a discussion on the expected performance.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear TranslocatorCell ProliferationCollagenEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedARNT protein, humanAryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear TranslocatorCollagen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.