Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31570875›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2019

A systems view of spliceosomal assembly and branchpoints with iCLIP.

Michael Briese, Nejc Haberman, Christopher R Sibley, Rupert Faraway, Andrea S Elser, Anob M Chakrabarti, Zhen Wang, Julian König, David Perera, Vihandha O Wickramasinghe and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome-wide detection of human variants that disrupt intronic branchpoints.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Michael Briese *MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Nejc Haberman *The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Christopher R Sibley *MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8286-4683
Rupert FarawayThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Andrea S ElserThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Anob M ChakrabartiThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Zhen WangMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Julian KönigMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
David PereraMRC Cancer Unit at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Vihandha O WickramasingheMRC Cancer Unit at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ashok R VenkitaramanMRC Cancer Unit at the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Nicholas M LuscombeThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5293-4778
Luciano SaievaCenter for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Livio PellizzoniCenter for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9168-5628
Christopher W J SmithDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-3398
Tomaž CurkFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4888-7256
Jernej UleMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK. jernej.ule@crick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2452-4277
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBColumbia University · USOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JPUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

RNA-Mediated Mechanisms of Motor System Dysfunction in Spinal Muscular AtrophyR01NS102451 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Livio Pellizzoni · 2017 to 2026
$3.9M
European Research Council 206726European Research Council 617837Medical Research Council MC_U105185858Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/8NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102451Wellcome Trust FC001002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of spliceosomal interactions are challenging due to their dynamic nature. Here we used spliceosome iCLIP, which immunoprecipitates SmB along with small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles and auxiliary RNA binding proteins, to map spliceosome engagement with pre-messenger RNAs in human cell lines. This revealed seven peaks of spliceosomal crosslinking around branchpoints (BPs) and splice sites. We identified RNA binding proteins that crosslink to each peak, including known and candidate splicing factors. Moreover, we detected the use of over 40,000 BPs with strong sequence consensus and structural accessibility, which align well to nearby crosslinking peaks. We show how the position and strength of BPs affect the crosslinking patterns of spliceosomal factors, which bind more efficiently upstream of strong or proximally located BPs and downstream of weak or distally located BPs. These insights exemplify spliceosome iCLIP as a broadly applicable method for transcriptomic studies of splicing mechanisms.

Indexed as

Cell LineHumansRibonucleoproteins, Small NuclearRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA PrecursorsRNA Splice SitesRNA SplicingSpliceosomesRibonucleoproteins, Small NuclearRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA PrecursorsRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID31570875
PMCPMC6859068
OpenAlexW2975372711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.