ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2019
Looking back and thinking forwards - 15 years of cardiology and cardiovascular research.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision percutaneous coronary intervention.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in heart failure.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Review
- Novel function of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in regulating post-infarct inflammation and the therapeutic significance.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive and in Situ Capacitive Sensing of Cardiac Troponin I from Interstitial Fluid.ACS sensors · 2025Article
- Sigma-1 Receptor Specific Biological Functions, Protective Role, and Therapeutic Potential in Cardiovascular Diseases.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2025Review
- Independent Relationship of Lipoprotein(a) and Carotid Atherosclerosis With Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Article
- Precision Nomothetic Medicine in Depression Research: A New Depression Model, and New Endophenotype Classes and Pathway Phenotypes, and A Digital Self.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Analysis of Immune Associated Co-Expression Networks Reveals Immune-Related Long Non-Coding RNAs during MI in the Presence and Absence of HDC.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza) restricts MD2/TLR4-MyD88 complex formation and signalling in acute myocardial infarction-induced heart failure.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Precision cardiology in the digital era.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first issue of Nature Reviews Cardiology was published in November 2004 under the name Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine. To celebrate our 15th anniversary in 2019, we invited six of our Advisory Board members to discuss what they considered the most important advances in their field of cardiovascular research or clinical practice in the past 15 years and what changes they envision for cardiovascular medicine in the next 15 years. Several practice-changing breakthroughs are described, including advances in procedural techniques to treat arrhythmias and hypertension and the development of novel therapeutic strategies to treat heart failure and pulmonary arterial hypertension, as well as those that target risk factors such as inflammation and elevated LDL-cholesterol levels. Furthermore, these key opinion leaders predict that machine learning technology and data derived from wearable devices will pave the way towards the coveted goal of personalized medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.