SynthesisJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020
Designation of neonatal levels of care: a review of state regulatory and monitoring policies.
Synthesis in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Summary of neonatal and maternal transport and reimbursement policies-a 5-year update.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Critical care among newborns with and without a COVID-19 diagnosis, May 2020-February 2022.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Article
- Maternal and neonatal risk-appropriate care: gaps, strategies, and areas for further research.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Review
- Trends in Resources for Neonatal Intensive Care at Delivery Hospitals for Infants Born Younger Than 30 Weeks' Gestation, 2009-2020.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Levels of neonatal care among birth facilities in 20 states and other jurisdictions: CDC levels of care assessment toolJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Article
- Accuracy and Completeness of Intermediate-Level Nursery Descriptions on Hospital Websites.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Seven years later: state neonatal risk-appropriate care policy consistency with the 2012 American Academy of Pediatrics Policy.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022Article
- CDC LOCATe: discrepancies between self-reported level of maternal care and LOCATe-assessed level of maternal care among 463 birth facilities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022Article
- Connecting policy to licensed assisted living communities, introducing health services regulatory analysis.Health services research · 2021Article
- Why so little progress in regionalization of perinatal care when transport of high-risk neonates remains a substantial risk?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSummarize policies on levels of neonatal care designation among 50 states and District of Columbia (DC). STUDY
designSystematic review of publicly available, web-based information on levels of neonatal care designation policies for each state/DC. Information on designating authorities, designation oversight, licensure requirement, and ongoing monitoring for designated levels of care abstracted from 2019 published rules, statutes, and regulations.
resultThirty-one (61%) of 50 states/DC had designated authority policies for neonatal levels of care. Fourteen (27%) incorporated oversight of neonatal levels of care into the licensure process. Among jurisdictions with designated authority, 25 (81%) used a state agency and 15 (48%) had direct oversight. Twenty-two (71%) of 31 states with a designating authority required ongoing monitoring, 14 (64%) used both hospital reporting and site visits for monitoring with only ten requiring site visits.
conclusionsLimited direct oversight influences regulation of regionalized systems, potentially impacting facility service monitoring and consequent management of vulnerable infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.