Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31570590›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Neural dynamics of semantic composition.

Bingjiang Lyu, Hun S Choi, William D Marslen-Wilson, Alex Clarke, Billi Randall, Lorraine K Tyler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluating cochlear implant outcomes in DFNA9 subjects: a comprehensive study on cerebral white matter lesions and vestibular abnormalities.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Neural encoding of semantic structures during sentence production.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Semantic composition in experimental and naturalistic paradigms.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Towards a unifying theory of linguistic meaning.Communicative & integrative biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bingjiang LyuCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EB Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hun S ChoiCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EB Cambridge, United Kingdom.
William D Marslen-WilsonCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EB Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alex ClarkeCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EB Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7768-5229
Billi RandallCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EB Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lorraine K TylerCentre for Speech, Language and the Brain, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EB Cambridge, United Kingdom lktyler@csl.psychol.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human speech comprehension is remarkable for its immediacy and rapidity. The listener interprets an incrementally delivered auditory input, millisecond by millisecond as it is heard, in terms of complex multilevel representations of relevant linguistic and nonlinguistic knowledge. Central to this process are the neural computations involved in semantic combination, whereby the meanings of words are combined into more complex representations, as in the combination of a verb and its following direct object (DO) noun (e.g., "eat the apple"). These combinatorial processes form the backbone for incremental interpretation, enabling listeners to integrate the meaning of each word as it is heard into their dynamic interpretation of the current utterance. Focusing on the verb-DO noun relationship in simple spoken sentences, we applied multivariate pattern analysis and computational semantic modeling to source-localized electro/magnetoencephalographic data to map out the specific representational constraints that are constructed as each word is heard, and to determine how these constraints guide the interpretation of subsequent words in the utterance. Comparing context-independent semantic models of the DO noun with contextually constrained noun models reflecting the semantic properties of the preceding verb, we found that only the contextually constrained model showed a significant fit to the brain data. Pattern-based measures of directed connectivity across the left hemisphere language network revealed a continuous information flow among temporal, inferior frontal, and inferior parietal regions, underpinning the verb's modification of the DO noun's activated semantics. These results provide a plausible neural substrate for seamless real-time incremental interpretation on the observed millisecond time scales.

Indexed as

SemanticsAdolescentAdultAuditory PerceptionBrainComprehensionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansLinguisticsMagnetoencephalographyMaleSpeech PerceptionYoung Adultcomputational modellingdirected connectivityEEG/MEGRSAspeech

Identifiers

PMID31570590
PMCPMC6800340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.