Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31570537›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Jose L Peña, Fanny Cazettes, Michael V Beckert, Brian J Fischer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Two Types of Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields in Different Parts of the Chicken's Midbrain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Barn Owl's Auditory Space Map Activity Matching Conditions for a Population Vector Readout to Drive Adaptive Sound-Localizing Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jose L PeñaDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York 10461, jose.pena@einstein.yu.edu.
Fanny CazettesChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal, and.ORCID 0000-0002-9648-4761
Michael V BeckertDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York 10461.ORCID 0000-0001-5440-966X
Brian J FischerDepartment of Mathematics, Seattle University, Seattle, Washington 98122.ORCID 0000-0001-5786-0544
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USChampalimaud Foundation · PTSeattle University · US

Funding

Coding of Auditory Space in the Avian BrainR01DC007690 · NIDCD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COL OF MED YESHIVA UNIV · PI PENA, JOSE L · 2005 to 2025
$7.5M
From microscale structure to population coding of normal and learned behaviorR01NS104911 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI DEBELLO, WILIAM MCINTYRE, ELLISMAN, MARK H · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
CRCNS: Coding for optimal performances in natural environmentsR01DC012949 · NIDCD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI FISCHER, BRIAN J, PENA, JOSE L · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007690NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012949NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major cue to infer sound direction is the difference in arrival time of the sound at the left and right ears, called interaural time difference (ITD). The neural coding of ITD and its similarity across species have been strongly debated. In the barn owl, an auditory specialist relying on sound localization to capture prey, ITDs within the physiological range determined by the head width are topographically represented at each frequency. The topographic representation suggests that sound direction may be inferred from the location of maximal neural activity within the map. Such topographical representation of ITD, however, is not evident in mammals. Instead, the preferred ITD of neurons in the mammalian brainstem often lies outside the physiological range and depends on the neuron's best frequency. Because of these disparities, it has been assumed that how spatial hearing is achieved in birds and mammals is fundamentally different. However, recent studies reveal ITD responses in the owl's forebrain and midbrain premotor area that are consistent with coding schemes proposed in mammals. Particularly, sound location in owls could be decoded from the relative firing rates of two broadly and inversely ITD-tuned channels. This evidence suggests that, at downstream stages, the code for ITD may not be qualitatively different across species. Thus, while experimental evidence continues to support the notion of differences in ITD representation across species and brain regions, the latest results indicate notable commonalities, suggesting that codes driving orienting behavior in mammals and birds may be comparable.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysBrainMammalsMesencephalonModels, NeurologicalNeuronsProsencephalonSound LocalizationSpecies SpecificityStrigiformes

Identifiers

PMID31570537
PMCPMC6855678
OpenAlexW2977391076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.