Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31570374›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2020

Genetic Counseling and Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Debra Lilienthal, Michelle Cahr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The importance of genetic counselling for turner syndrome transition.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Assisted reproductive technology: Short- and long-term outcomes.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Debra LilienthalThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Michelle CahrCalifornia Cryobank Life Sciences, Los Angeles, California 90025, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the ever-increasing number of patients undergoing fertility treatments and the expanded use of genetic testing in this context, there has been limited focus in the literature on the involvement of genetics professionals in the assisted reproductive technology (ART) setting. Here we discuss the importance of genetic counseling within reproductive medicine. We review how genetic testing of embryos is performed, the process of gamete donation, the challenges associated with genetic testing, and the complexities of genetic test result interpretation.

Indexed as

FemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHumansInfertility, FemaleInfertility, MaleMaleReproductive MedicineReproductive Techniques, Assisted

Identifiers

PMID31570374
PMCPMC7605230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.