Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31570361›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2019

Vaginal delivery in the 30+4 weeks of pregnancy and organ donation after brain death in early pregnancy.

Ann Kristin Reinhold, Markus Kredel, Christian K Markus, Peter Kranke

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A structured analysis of the concept of brain death.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ann Kristin ReinholdDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Markus KredelDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Christian K MarkusDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Peter KrankeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-981X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 28-year-old woman suffered a traffic accident resulting in severe head injuries with deleterious prognosis. Diagnostics further revealed a hitherto unknown pregnancy, at suspected week 9. Based on the patient's wish to donate organs, brain death protocol confirmed irreversible loss of brain function. Yet, vital pregnancy rendered organ transplantation impossible. Multiple ethical and legal issues arose, from invalidation of established legal care after brain death to the delivery of a healthy child after trauma and long-term critical care. After medicolegal and ethical counselling, pregnancy was sustained, and the goal of organ donation postponed. Critical care focused on foetal homeostasis. At 30+4 weeks, a viable girl was born via assisted vaginal delivery. Postpartal organ donation resulted in heart, kidney and pancreas transplantation. The case emphasises the medical, legal and ethical challenges to combine two apparently diametrical goals: the successful full-term pregnancy and the fulfilment of a patient's wish to donate organs.

Indexed as

Brain DeathMothersAdultAdvance DirectivesCounselingCritical CareFemaleFetal ViabilityHumansLife Support CareLiving DonorsPatient AdvocacyPatient RightsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal Careadult intensive careethicspregnancytraumatrauma CNS/PNS

Identifiers

PMID31570361
PMCPMC6768348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.