Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31569742›Full record

SynthesisMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2019

Conventional and Complementary Medicine Health Care Practitioners' Perspectives on Interprofessional Communication: A Qualitative Rapid Review.

Janet Nguyen, Lorraine Smith, Jennifer Hunter, Joanna E Harnett

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Insights into how Malaysian adults with limited health literacy self-manage and live with asthma: A Photovoice qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janet NguyenFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. jngu0475@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Lorraine SmithFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. lorraine.smith@sydney.edu.au.
Jennifer HunterFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. jennifer.hunter@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6109-9134
Joanna E HarnettFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. joanna.harnett@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9904-2144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInterprofessional RelationsComplementary TherapiesCooperative BehaviorHealth PersonnelHumansProfessional RoleQualitative Researchcomplementary medicinehealth communicationhealth personnelinterprofessional relationsnursespharmacistsphysicians

Identifiers

PMID31569742
PMCPMC6843134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.