Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31569600›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Preconception Folic Acid Supplement Use in Immigrant Women (1999-2016).

Roy M Nilsen, Anne K Daltveit, Marjolein M Iversen, Marit G Sandberg, Erica Schytt, Rhonda Small, Ragnhild B Strandberg, Eline S Vik, Vigdis Aasheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roy M NilsenFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien, 28, 5063 Bergen, Norway. roy.miodini.nilsen@hvl.no.
Anne K DaltveitDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien 31, 5018 Bergen, Norway. anne.daltveit@uib.no.
Marjolein M IversenFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien, 28, 5063 Bergen, Norway. marjolein.memelink.iversen@hvl.no.
Marit G SandbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 72, 5053 Bergen, Norway. marit.g.sandberg@gmail.com.
Erica SchyttFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien, 28, 5063 Bergen, Norway. erica.schytt@ltdalarna.se.
Rhonda SmallDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. r.small@latrobe.edu.au.
Ragnhild B StrandbergFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien, 28, 5063 Bergen, Norway. ragnhild.bjarkoy.strandberg@hvl.no.
Eline S VikFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien, 28, 5063 Bergen, Norway. eline.skirnisdottir.vik@hvl.no.
Vigdis AasheimFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Inndalsveien, 28, 5063 Bergen, Norway. vigdis.aasheim@hvl.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines how preconception folic acid supplement use varied in immigrant women compared with non-immigrant women. We analyzed national population-based data from Norway from 1999-2016, including 1,055,886 pregnancies, of which 202,234 and 7,965 were to 1st and 2nd generation immigrant women, respectively. Folic acid supplement use was examined in relation to generational immigrant category, maternal country of birth, and length of residence. Folic acid supplement use was lower overall in 1st and 2nd generation immigrant women (21% and 26%, respectively) compared with Norwegian-born women (29%). The lowest use among 1st generation immigrant women was seen in those from Eritrea, Ethiopia, Morocco, and Somalia (around 10%). The highest use was seen in immigrant women from the United States, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Iceland (>30%). Folic acid supplement use increased with increasing length of residence in immigrant women from most countries, but the overall prevalence was lower compared with Norwegian-born women even after 20 years of residence (adjusted odds ratio: 0.63; 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.67). This study suggests that immigrant women from a number of countries are less likely to use preconception folic acid supplements than non-immigrant women, even many years after settlement.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfrica, EasternDenmarkDietary SupplementsEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleFolic AcidHumansIcelandMoroccoNetherlandsNorwayOdds RatioPatient Acceptance of Health CarePreconception CareFolic Acidcountry of birthethnicityfolatefolic acidimmigrantlength of residencemigrantneural tube defectsNorwaypregnancyvitamins

Identifiers

PMID31569600
PMCPMC6836227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.