Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31569575›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2019

Probiotic Bifunctionality of

Hadar Kimelman, Moshe Shemesh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. MitigatingBiofilm · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. mSystems · 2024
    Article
  9. The Combination ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  10. Effects of a novelHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Autoclaved Diet with Inactivated Spores ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  17. Impact ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hadar KimelmanDepartment of Food Sciences, Institute for Postharvest Technology and Food Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel. hadar.kimelman@mail.huji.ac.il.
Moshe ShemeshDepartment of Food Sciences, Institute for Postharvest Technology and Food Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel. moshesh@agri.gov.il.
Agricultural Research Organization · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

Chief Scientist of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (Israel) 4210376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Live probiotic bacteria obtained with food are thought to have beneficial effects on a mammalian host, including their ability to reduce intestinal colonization by pathogens. To ensure the beneficial effects, the probiotic cells must survive processing and storage of food, its passage through the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and subsequent chemical ingestion processes until they reach their target organ. However, there is considerable loss of viability of the probiotic bacteria during the drying process, in the acidic conditions of the stomach, and in the high bile concentration in the small intestine.

Indexed as

beneficial biofilmbio-coatingB. subtilisextracellular matrixpathogen eliminationprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID31569575
PMCPMC6843919
OpenAlexW2976689092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.