Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31569522›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

And in the Middle of My Chaos There Was You?-Dog Companionship and Its Impact on the Assessment of Stressful Situations.

Christine Krouzecky, Lisa Emmett, Armin Klaps, Jan Aden, Anastasiya Bunina, Birgit U Stetina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Association between Pet Ownership and Threatened Abortion in Pregnant Women: The China Birth Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Psycho-Social Impact of Human-Animal Interactions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The State of Animal-Assisted Interventions: Addressing the Contemporary Issues that will Shape the Future.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine KrouzeckyPsychological Outpatient Clinic, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, 1020 Wien, Austria. christine.krouzecky@sfu.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-3054-081X
Lisa EmmettPsychological Outpatient Clinic, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, 1020 Wien, Austria. lisa.emmett@sfu.ac.at.
Armin KlapsPsychological Outpatient Clinic, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, 1020 Wien, Austria. armin.klaps@sfu.ac.at.
Jan AdenFaculty of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, 1020 Wien, Austria. jan.aden@sfu.ac.at.
Anastasiya BuninaFaculty of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, 1020 Wien, Austria. anastasiya.bunina@sfu.ac.at.
Birgit U StetinaPsychological Outpatient Clinic, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, 1020 Wien, Austria. birgit.u.stetina@sfu.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-8711-1923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies show evidence that human-dog companionship has healthy effects on humans. For example, findings demonstrate that owning a dog leads to a reduction in stress levels. Aspects that have not been taken into consideration so far are underlying theoretical principles of stress like the sense of coherence (SOC) by Aaron Antonovsky. The SOC consists of psycho-social, biochemical and physical conditions which indicate whether or not inner and outer stimuli are comprehensive, manageable and meaningful to an individual. In addition, it is still unclear if owning a dog affects the subjective assessment of critical life events (CLE), which is associated with the strength of the SOC (the stronger the SOC, the better the handling and assessment of stressful situations). Based on these aspects, the goal of the study was to examine if dog ownership, as well as values of the SOC, have an impact on the subjective evaluation of CLE (including daily hassles as well as unexpected critical life events). For this purpose, dog owners and non-dog owners were surveyed online and were compared based on their personal estimations regarding these constructs. Statistical analysis including t-tests, correlations and interaction-analyses were performed and a significant difference between dog owners and non-dog owners regarding the assessment of daily hassles was found. Contrary to expectations, results show that dog owners assessed daily stressors to be more stressful than non-dog owners did. Moreover, data show that the higher the number of stated relationships (inner- and cross-species), the more stressful life events were assessed to be. Calculations showed no evidence for the influence of dogs regarding the SOC. Based on the actual findings, it might be assumed, that an overestimation of the dog's protective role regarding stress has taken place in public media and in research as well.

Indexed as

Human-Animal BondLife Change EventsSense of CoherenceAdultAnimalsDogsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOwnershipStress, PsychologicalYoung Adultcritical life eventshuman-dog relationshipinner- and cross-species relationshipsrole-specific responsibilitiessense of coherence

Identifiers

PMID31569522
PMCPMC6801798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.