Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31569514›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Pore Structure as a Response to the Freeze/Thaw Resistance of Mortars.

Ivanka Netinger Grubeša, Berislav Marković, Martina Vračević, Maria Tunkiewicz, Imre Szenti, Ákos Kukovecz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ivanka Netinger GrubešaFaculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Vladimira Preloga 3, 31000 Osijek, Croatia. nivanka@gfos.hr.
Berislav MarkovićDepartment of Chemistry, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Ulica cara Hadrijana 8/A, 31000 Osijek, Croatia. bmarkovi@kemija.unios.hr.ORCID 0000-0001-5036-8960
Martina VračevićCivil Engineering Institut of Croatia, Drinska 18, 31000 Osijek, Croatia. martina.vracevic@igh.hr.
Maria TunkiewiczInstitute of Building Engineering, Faculty of Geodesy, Geospatial and Civil Engineering, Heweliusza 4, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland. maria.tunkiewicz@uwm.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-5951
Imre SzentiInterdisciplinary Excellence Centre, Department of Applied and Environmental Chemistry, University of Szeged, Rerrich Béla tér 1, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary. szentiimre@gmail.com.
Ákos KukoveczInterdisciplinary Excellence Centre, Department of Applied and Environmental Chemistry, University of Szeged, Rerrich Béla tér 1, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary. kakos@chem.u-szeged.hu.
University of Osijek · HRUniversity of Szeged · HUInstitute of Geodesy and Cartography · PL

Funding

Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office; Ministry of Human Capacities, Hungary; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00013; GINOP-2.3.3-15-2016-00010 ; 2018-2.1.12-TÉT-HR-2018-00009; 20391-3/2018/FEKUSTRAT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, the resistance to the freeze/thaw cycles for four groups of mortars (lime-LM, lime based-LBM, cement-CM, and aerated cement-ACM mortars) with different amount of mortar components within each group is quantified via a ratio of flexural/compressive strength after and before exposure to freeze/thaw cycles. Using a pore system obtained by three different methods (mercury intrusion porosimetry, X-ray micro-computed tomography analysis, and SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy) analysis), an attempt was made to explain why some mortars achieved better resistance to freeze/thaw cycles than others. The mortars with lime as a binder in the composition (LM and LBM groups) did not survive the freezing and thawing regime, while no visible damage was recorded in samples of the CM and ACM group. It is concluded that the low initial value of the mechanical properties of the LM and LBM mortars, as well as the higher proportion of harmful pores (pores greater than 0.064 μm) compared to CM and ACM mortars are responsible for their poor durability. According the results of nanotomography, it is concluded that the most important factor influencing freeze/thaw resistance is pore connectivity-the higher the connectivity of the macropores, the higher the freeze/thaw resistance of the mortar. SEM analysis proved to be a very useful method for aerated cement mortars as it revealed the pore sizes that were not covered by mercury porosimetry and nanotomography.

Indexed as

freeze/thaw resistancemercury intrusion porosimetrymortarSEM analysisX-ray micro-computed tomography analysis

Identifiers

PMID31569514
PMCPMC6803962
OpenAlexW2977181567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.