Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31569122›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2019

Clinicopathological characteristics of Epstein-Barr virus-positive gastric cancer in Latvia.

Evita Gasenko, Sergejs Isajevs, Maria Constanza Camargo, George Johan A Offerhaus, Inese Polaka, Margaret L Gulley, Roberts Skapars, Armands Sivins, Ilona Kojalo, Arnis Kirsners and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification of anti-Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibody signature in EBV-associated gastric carcinoma.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Evita GasenkoInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Sergejs IsajevsInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Maria Constanza CamargoDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
George Johan A OfferhausDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Inese PolakaInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Margaret L GulleyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Roberts SkaparsInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Armands SivinsInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Ilona KojaloInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Arnis KirsnersInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Daiga SantareInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Jelizaveta PavlovaInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Olga SjominaInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Elina LiepinaRiga East University Hospital.
Liliana TzivianInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Charles S RabkinDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Marcis LejaInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine.
Research Institute of Therapy and Preventive Medicine · RURiga East University Hospital · LVDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsRiga Technical University · LVUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Latvia · LVUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEpstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer has been proposed to be a distinct gastric cancer molecular subtype. The prognostic significance of EBV infection in gastric cancer remains unclear and needs further investigation. Our study aimed to analyze EBV-positive and EBV-negative gastric cancer patients regarding their personal and tumor-related characteristics, and compare their overall survival.

methodsGastric cancer patients consecutively treated at the Riga East University Hospital during 2009-2016 were identified retrospectively. Tumor EBV status was determined by in-situ hybridization for EBV-encoded RNA (EBER). Information about clinicopathological characteristics was obtained from patient questionnaires, hospital records. Overall survival was ascertained through 30 July 2017. Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for personal and tumor-related covariates compared survival between EBV-positive and EBV-negative patients.

resultsThere were a total of 302 gastric cancer patients (61% males) with mean and SD age 63.6 ± 11.5 years. EBER positivity was present in 8.6% of tumors. EBV-positive gastric cancer patients had better survival at 80 months [adjusted hazard ratio = 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.19-0.72] compared to EBV-negative patients. Worse survival was observed for patients with stage III (hazard ratio = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.67-4.56) and stage IV (hazard ratio = 10.02, 95% CI = 5.72-17.57) compared to stage I gastric cancer, and overlapping and unspecified subsite (hazard ratio = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.14; 3.00) compared to distal tumors.

conclusionTumor EBV positivity is a favorable prognostic factor in gastric cancer.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionComorbidityEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLatviaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOverweight

Identifiers

PMID31569122
PMCPMC8560222
OpenAlexW2979238500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.