Trial reportESC heart failure2019
Hepatorenal dysfunction identifies high-risk patients with acute heart failure: insights from the RELAX-AHF trial.
Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Joint modelling on clinical trials in clinical journals: a systematic review.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Pooled it
- Joint modelling of longitudinal processes and time-to-event outcomes in heart failure: systematic review and exemplar examining the relationship between serum digoxin levels and mortality.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Pooled it
- Hepatorenal dysfunction identifies high-risk patients with acute heart failure: insights from the RELAX-AHF trial.ESC heart failure · 2019Trial
- Combining MELD-XI score and hemodynamic parameters enhances short-term prognostic value in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Liver Function Abnormalities in Acute Heart Failure: A State-of-the-art Review from an International Expert Group.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Early in-hospital treatment of acute heart failure. Part 2 of the international expert opinion series on AHF management.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Harnessing the lymphatic system.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Application of Metabolomics and the Discovery of Potential Serum Biomarkers for Diuretic Resistance in Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- MELD score predicts outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure: A longitudinal evaluation.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Current Review of Heart Failure-Related Risk and Prognostic Factors.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Pathophysiology and Treatment Opportunities of Iron Deficiency in Heart Failure: Is There a Need for Further Trials?Current heart failure reports · 2023Review
- Implication of modified MELD scores for postdischarge prognosis in hospitalized patients with heart failure.Heart and vessels · 2023Article
- Renal Assessment in Acute Cardiorenal Syndrome.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Prognostic value of the dynamic hepatorenal function on intermediate-term mortality in TAVI patients with survival to discharge.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- Hepatorenal dysfunction in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- HDL-apoA-II Is Strongly Associated with 1-Year Mortality in Acute Heart Failure Patients.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Blood urea nitrogen to serum albumin ratio as a new prognostic indicator in critical patients with chronic heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- The MELD-XI score predicts 3-year mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Differences in the Biomarker Profile of De Novo Acute Heart Failure versus Decompensation of Chronic Heart Failure.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsEpisodes of acute heart failure (AHF) may lead to end-organ dysfunction. In this post hoc analysis of the Relaxin in Acute Heart Failure trial, we used the MELD-XI (Model of End-Stage Liver Dysfunction) score to examine hepatorenal dysfunction in patients with AHF. METHODS AND
resultsOn admission, the MELD-XI score was elevated (abnormal) in 918 (82%) patients, with 638 (57%) having isolated renal dysfunction (creatinine > 1 mg/dL), 73 (6.5%) isolated liver dysfunction (bilirubin > 1 mg/dL), and 207 (18.5%) coexisting dysfunction of the kidneys and the liver (both creatinine and bilirubin > 1 mg/dL). The percentage of patients with elevated MELD-XI score remained constant through a 60 day follow-up, as we observed a gradual decrease of liver dysfunction prevalence, counterbalanced by an increase in renal dysfunction. Serelaxin treatment was associated with a lower MELD-XI score on Day 2 and Day 5 (both P < 0.05), but this difference vs. placebo disappeared during longer follow-up. In the multivariable model, an elevated MELD-XI score on admission was associated with higher 180 day mortality: hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for cardiovascular death were 3.10 (1.22-7.87), and for all-cause death 2.47 (1.19-5.15); both P < 0.05. The addition of the MELD-XI score to a prespecified prognostic model increased the discrimination of the model for all-cause death, but the increment in the C-index was only modest: 0.013 (P = 0.02).
conclusionsIn patients with AHF, hepatorenal dysfunction is prevalent and related to poor outcome. The MELD-XI score is a useful prognosticator in AHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.