Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31568600›Full record

ArticleMedical education2019

Speaking up, support, control and work engagement of medical residents. A structural equation modelling analysis.

Judith J Voogt, Toon W Taris, Elizabeth L J van Rensen, Margriet M E Schneider, Mirko Noordegraaf, Marieke F van der Schaaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Judith J VoogtExecutive Board, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5158-1664
Toon W TarisDepartment of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1946-3307
Elizabeth L J van RensenExecutive Board, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Margriet M E SchneiderExecutive Board, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Mirko NoordegraafUtrecht School of Governance, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marieke F van der SchaafCentre for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6555-5320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMedical residents can play key roles in improving health care quality by speaking up and giving suggestions for improvements. However, previous research on speaking up by medical residents has shown that speaking up is difficult for residents. This study explored: (i) whether two main aspects of medical residents' work context (job control and supervisor support) are associated with speaking up by medical residents, and (ii) whether these associations differ between in-hospital and out-of-hospital settings.

methodsSpeaking up was operationalised and measured as voice behaviour. Structural equation modelling using a cross-sectional survey design was used to identify and test factors pertaining to speaking up and to compare hospital settings.

resultsA total of 499 medical residents in the Netherlands participated in the study. Correlational analysis showed significant positive associations between each of support and control, and voice behaviour. The authors assumed that the associations between support and control, and voice behaviour would be partially mediated by engagement. This partial mediation model fitted the data best, but showed no association between support and voice. However, multi-group analysis showed that for residents in hospital settings, support is associated with voice behaviour. For residents outside hospital settings, control is more important. Engagement mediated the effects of control and support outside hospital settings, but not within the hospital.

conclusionsThis study shows that in order to enable medical residents to share their suggestions for improvement, it is beneficial to invest in supportive supervision and to increase their sense of control. Boosting medical residents' support would be most effective in hospital settings, whereas in other health care organisations it would be more effective to focus on job control.

Indexed as

CommunicationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternal-External ControlInternship and ResidencyLatent Class AnalysisLeadershipMaleNetherlandsQuality of Health CareStudents, MedicalWork EngagementWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID31568600
PMCPMC6856833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.