Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31568533›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Sign and goal tracker rats process differently the incentive salience of a conditioned stimulus.

Almudena Serrano-Barroso, Juan Pedro Vargas, Estrella Diaz, Patricio O'Donnell, Juan Carlos López

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Modulation of Dopamine Neurons Alters Behavior and Event Encoding in the Nucleus Accumbens during Pavlovian Conditioning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chronic Stress Prevents Cortico-Accumbens Cue Encoding and Alters Conditioned Approach.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Almudena Serrano-BarrosoDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Juan Pedro VargasDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4358-5737
Estrella DiazDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Patricio O'DonnellTranslational Research and Experimental Medicine, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Juan Carlos LópezDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sign and goal tracker animals show different behavioral patterns in response to conditioned stimuli, which may be driven by different neural circuits involved in processing stimuli. Here, we explored whether sign and goal-tracker profiles implicated different brain regions and responses to incentive salience of stimuli. We performed three experiments using male Wistar rats. Experiment 1 showed that lesioning the medial prefrontal cortex increased the prevalence of the goal-tracker phenotype. Experiment 2 assessed the developmental trajectory of the salience incentive attribution to a conditioned stimulus, showing that increased incentive salience of stimuli increased the prevalence of the sign-tracker phenotype in mature, but not preadolescent rats. In experiment 3, the functional impact of the medial prefrontal cortex circuits was analyzed with a latent inhibition procedure. Sign tracker rats showed a reduced latent inhibition to stimuli previously exposed when compared to goal tracker or intermediate rats. The overall results of this study highlight a key role of the medial prefrontal cortex for sign tracking behavior. The expression of sign and goal tracker phenotypes changed after lesion to the medial prefrontal cortex (experiment 1), differed across development (experiment 2), and showed differences in the attentional processes to previously exposed stimuli, as preexposure to CS was ineffective in sign tracker animals (experiment 3). These data indicate that the responses to the incentive salience of stimuli in sign tracker and goal tracker profiles are likely driven by different neural circuitry, with a different role of prefrontal cortical function.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalReinforcement, PsychologyAge FactorsAnimalsAttentionConditioning, ClassicalCuesExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsGoalsMaleN-MethylaspartatePrefrontal CortexRatsRats, WistarRewardStereotaxic TechniquesExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsN-Methylaspartate

Identifiers

PMID31568533
PMCPMC6768469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.